Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Rich West wrote:
>
>
>
>>I did some further analysis and discovered that the messages (with the
>>same message ID) were showing up in the "ps" output as processing "from
>>queue". Digging a little further, I tri
I did some further analysis and discovered that the messages (with the
same message ID) were showing up in the "ps" output as processing "from
queue". Digging a little further, I tried killing off the sendmail
processes that were processing those requests, and I saw the following
appear in the
I've had mailman running for years and have only recently started having
some delivery problems with it. I originally chalked it up to a
particular set of users within the one list that I am on (we host a
bunch of lists for others), but, after some investigation, I have been
unable to narrow d
Damn Gentoo stuck it elsewhere. Searching.
I know what you mean.. Fedora sticks 'em in /var/log/mailman.. For key
tools such as this one (mailman), I tend to lean towards rolling my own..
smtp-failure shows the following:
Oct 07 07:57:24 2004 (6344) All recipients refused:
{'[EMAIL PROTECTE
Well, a couple of places to look would be in:
/var/mailman/logs/smtp
/var/mailman/logs/smtp-failure
/var/mailman/qfiles/out, in, shunt
/var/log/maillog
If things are backed up, you should see the outbound messages piling up
in the "out" folder.
Any errors, for what they are, should be in smtp-fai
Mark Sapiro wrote:
o In the sendmail logs, I get (just do the normal replacements for the
words "at" and "dot"):
Oct 23 21:26:08 cranium sm-mta[13718]: i9O1Q8EF013718:
from=,
size=1421, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost
[127.0.0.1]
The above envelope from is VERP
Even more info.. the problem is definitely unpredictable..
Here's some tests I performed with a newly created test mailing list.
Test 1
o Added one person, me, to the list.
o Sent a message to the list.
o Received the posting. No errors or anything were reported in
sendmail's logs or mailman's lo
I don't know how to 'turn up' the logging on mailman in order to dig
further to see what it is doing..
Also, the email you sent was direct, via SMTP, to the server.. the
same server that mailman sits on..
Not sure where else to look...
-Rich
Rich West wrote:
Interesting.. in investi
at mailman sits on..
Not sure where else to look...
-Rich
Rich West wrote:
Interesting.. in investigating another problem, I noticed the
following in the smtp-error file:
Oct 22 12:14:49 2004 (4223) All recipients refused:
{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': (550, '5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
see
anything else?
Do you have disk space left?
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 12:09, Rich West wrote:
I migrated our main server from Fedora Core 1 (running our own built
version of mailman 2.1.5) to another server running a fresh install of
Fedora Core 2 (running our own built version of mailman 2.1.5
sits on..
Not sure where else to look...
-Rich
Rich West wrote:
Interesting.. in investigating another problem, I noticed the
following in the smtp-error file:
Oct 22 12:14:49 2004 (4223) All recipients refused:
{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': (550, '5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User
Interesting.. in investigating another problem, I noticed the following
in the smtp-error file:
Oct 22 12:14:49 2004 (4223) All recipients refused:
{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': (550, '5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User
unknown')}, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oct 22 12:14:49 2004 (4223) delivery to [EMAIL
I migrated our main server from Fedora Core 1 (running our own built
version of mailman 2.1.5) to another server running a fresh install of
Fedora Core 2 (running our own built version of mailman 2.1.5) about two
weeks ago.
Since that time, we have had continual problems with our mailman
insta
which started things working, though.
Now, I just have to go through and migrate the existing lists. :)
Hopefully, that won't be too difficult. :)
Thanks for all of your help!
-Rich
Rich West wrote:
Ok.. I blew away my test list, set USE_HTDIG=1, restarted the qrunner,
created the list with
I realize this has come up often in the list, but hit a snag and was not
sure where else to turn. I couldn't find much in the archives that
addressed this, but if it is a duplicate, please accept my apologies.
I've applied the htDig patches :
http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mailman/patches/728836/tem
Can you confirm you mean that the per-list htdig directories of the
following form are being created:
$prefix/archives/private//htdig are being created
and that inside each of them there is a file named .conf
Is there also a file called rundig_last_run and a bunch of ,db files
in any of the
Assuming you are using en as the list language and standard templates,
can you take a look at the file
$prefix/templates/en/archtoc.html
line 16 should read:
%(htsearch)s
Yup.. it is there..
This is where the results of the quick_maketext() on
TOC_htsearch.html, that is the search
I have finally nailed down the SPEC file for proper full installation of mailman
2.1. For those that want the binary, it can be grabbed from:
ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/i386/mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm
The Source RPM can be grabbed from here:
ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/SRPMS/mailman-2.1-1.src.
I rolled an RPM earlier today. If anyone finds it useful, feel free to use it.
ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/i386/mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm
ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/SRPMS/mailman-2.1-1.src.rpm
Now the idea of "own responsibility" might be a little shaky. :)
-Rich
> > "DKP" == David K Pa
This is probably a quick one, but I thought I would mail it out to the list. I
did check the archives, but didn't have much luck.
We are running 2.0.13 and I took on the task of upgrading to 2.1. Our RH-based
server is running Sendmail (8.12.7) and happily chugging along managing a few
dozen lis
Just to close this out, the cronjobs get installed as part of the RPM
installation which explains why it is not on the "checklist".
-Rich
--
Richard Westmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Systems Administrator
Diva - Princeton, NJhttp://www.divatv.com
I posted recently about my troubles with getting sendmail 8.12.1 and Mailman 2.0.6 to
work happily, and, surprisingly, I have managed to make some progress.
Right now, the two are working happily together, BUT, mail to any of the lists keeps
looping for ever and ever. I watched the qfile direc
Just to get ahead of the game, I didn't write it. :)
>And this doesn't mention crontabs?
>
I think they just included the core things to get it up and running
>Does the RPM install really do the right thing? How can it know if
>I want news gatewaying or not?...
>
Just to clarify: my under
The docs usually get stored in /usr/share/doc/mailman-..
But, besides that, you really just have to know where the installation
is.. It should be installed in /var/mailman if you used the RPM, and the
directory tree is essentially the same from there on out.
I believe if you do a "rpm -qi mail
running under a separate user
(other than root), and the differentiation between processes that handle
the receiving of mail and the delivering of mail certainly adds to the
security of the system.
:-)
Thanks!
-Rich
Jon Carnes wrote:
>On Thursday 04 October 2001 12:03, Rich West wrote:
>
This is going to sound stupid, but, with Sendmail's new MSP configuration, I have been
unable to get sendmail + MailMan to work properly. I feel like I am in a catch-22
here:
o Configure Defaults.py to use SMTPDirect, and sendmail starts seeing email from list
(outgoing to queue members) as be
26 matches
Mail list logo
