to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 10/29/2006 4:01 PM
To: Peter Kofod; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Performance on mailman
At 11:26 AM -0500 10/29/06, Peter Kofod wrote:
> My blocks in (bi) and swap in (si) seem very high compared to what the
> FAQ says. Furtherm
Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 8:05 PM
To: Peter Kofod; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Performance on mailman
Peter Kofod wrote:
>I am doing something wrong. I am running mailman with about 100 lists
>(announce only). A couple are pret
I am doing something wrong. I am running mailman with about 100 lists
(announce only). A couple are pretty big (40K + addresses). They,
however, are used infrequently. The big list has one weekly mailing and
the others much less often. Currently, there is NO mail queued or being
sent (tail -f
Mark Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 5:13 PM
To: Peter Kofod; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Using Accepted in the header
Peter Kofod wrote:
>I have an announce-only list with one member who can post. I have it
>set up so tha
I have an announce-only list with one member who can post. I have it
set up so that he is not moderated, all others are moderated.
Currently, I discard moderated postings as well as non-member postings.
I want to tighten the setup a bit more so that the list owner (who is
the only non moderated us
Hi Everyone:
I am new to this list having just implemented mailman for an
announce-list we host. In short, the performance is horrible. The list
has approx 40,000 subscribers and the avg message going out is about 40K
(some embedded imagery). I know we can do better with lazy html etc.,
but the
