Re: Fwd: [Mailman-Users] shunt messages

2003-09-18 Thread Nicolas Bertrand
ossible means to get into the 'state' above). And again, I really don't think it was/is a configuration/installation issue since the other 12 lists work without any complaints and/or problems." Cheers, Nic >>> Nicolas Bertrand 09/18/03 09:14am >>> >

[Mailman-Users] shunt messages

2003-09-18 Thread Nicolas Bertrand
Hello, We are having some serious problem with a 2.1.2 mailman install. Some messages get transferred to qfiles/shunt and stay there forever. I am calling on your help on this one. I understand from previous mailing list posts that the shunt directory is used by mailman if: o messages are too

Re: [Mailman-Users] Big delays wrapper to delivery

2003-07-27 Thread Nicolas Bertrand
and 214. In the absence of a flash of insight it might be worth trying. Let me know how you get on Richard On Sunday, July 27, 2003, at 11:47 AM, Nicolas Bertrand wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > The time between does indeed equates to the time between the message > arrive

Re: [Mailman-Users] Big delays wrapper to delivery

2003-07-27 Thread Nicolas Bertrand
>>> On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 08:09 PM, Nicolas Bertrand wrote: > Hello > > We have a few low volume mailing lists . We have been been happy with > the performance since instigating these (about a year and half ago) and > these mailing lists have become quite important.

[Mailman-Users] Big delays wrapper to delivery

2003-07-26 Thread Nicolas Bertrand
Hello We have a few low volume mailing lists . We have been been happy with the performance since instigating these (about a year and half ago) and these mailing lists have become quite important. However, suddenly, delivery times to subscribers have increased to 8-12 hours and cannot figure out