d fwknop to
be rock solid, and I've never had even a single attack on services that
use fwknop. http://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/
Natu
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mail
getting your message through if it has a
valid DKIM signature. A bad DKIM signature will likely cause problems.
I know that under some circumstances mailman strips dkim signatures, but
it's best to look at headers to see what is actually happening.
I realize you have no abili
uses upstart to start services? Check to
see if you have /etc/init/mailman.conf or similar and if so, verify that
the script is correct.
Natu
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman
On 05/20/2014 05:17 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Natu writes:
>
> > If there is a dkim signature and it fails google will treat it as
> > spam
>
> Note that, taking your words literally, this is against the DKIM RFCs
> -- a failed signature is supposed to be treate
On 05/19/2014 09:56 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> I am not exactly sure, but I wanted to try "fixing" this and see if
> things got better. The real problem is Google/Gmail tagging the mailing
> list messages as Spam, but since the headers are fine, the cause must be
> something else.
My expe
On 05/19/2014 04:49 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> Thank you for your feedback. I'm most inclined to handle replies based
>> on the needs of the particular list. ...
> No, I mean what will you do when people respond to your synthesized
> names? At some point you'll get mail at the server for mydomain.
On 05/19/2014 10:02 AM, John Levine wrote:
>> So, addresses get rewritten as:
>>
>> From: yahoousername-at-yahoo@mydomain.com
>> My sense is that someone could come up with arguments as to why this is
>> a bad idea, ...
> It's a bad idea for the same reason that all of the other anti-DMARC
> ha
On 05/13/2014 10:47 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Today I experimented with first_strip_reply_to set to No.
>>
>> This means that a reply is addressed to both the list and to previous
>> author.
>> If nodups = Yes.
>> Then the previous author will get only 1 copy of the message. But the copy
>> t
adds headers/footers to the
message. Is this behaviour any different in more recent versions?
Are there any workable solutions out there to get mailman to be able to
pass the message through with the original senders DKIM signature,
without breaking the signature?
Thank You,
Natu
