And just to throw a bit more fuel on the fire, my reply to Mark bounced
as "Reason: spam source blocked"
:-)
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> When posting to a list, if I reply to a reply to a reply, I get a
>> rejection from the server say
Mark
Thanks as ever. The incoming mail was (appeared to be) in plain text, so
I've made an amendment in Thunderbird's settings to reply in plain text.
I'll see what happens next time I try to reply as previous.
Rgds
MD
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
When posting to a list, if I reply to a reply to a reply, I get a
rejection from the server saying "The message's content type was not
explicitly allowed" - but prior to this, the messages get accepted. Any
ideas what may be causing this, and what the admin can do (no command
line access) to pr
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>> What Mailman version is this, and is it a package or a source install?
>>>
>>> I've only actually tested this on 2.1.5, but I see nothing in the code
>>&
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>> If you enable delivery for these test members, do they receive either
>>> ordinary or urgent posts?
>>>
>> Yep - both types. Just tried them out now.
&
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>> Check Mailman's smtp and smtp-failure logs to see how many recipients
>>> Mailman sent to and if there were any failures at the smtp level. Also
>>&
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> No, definitely not. As explained above, this account I'm sending from
>> now received the message OK. I amended the settings for this account to
>> digest only and the mail got through as a regular mail, as you
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>> I have a test list, and tried this out. I subscribed a couple of extra
>> accounts of mine to the list, and set them to No Mail (disabled by
>> administrator). Sending a mail to the list with the "Urgent: &quo
he headers and found that the password
doesn't appear ;-). Don't want my more savvy members checking things out
and discovering what they shouldn't ;-)
Rgds
MD
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Brad Knowles wrote:
>
>
>> At 8:10 AM +0100 4/2/07, Martin Dennett wrote:
>&g
Hi
I have a topic set up which I use to be able to send to ALL members of
the list, even if they choose to read on the web only (similar to the
Yahoo Special Notices feature). However, if anyone replies to a mail
that follows the rule, all members subscribed to the topic also receive
those rep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Subject:
> Re: [Mailman-Users] Filter based on message text
> From:
> Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:53:49 -0800
> To:
> Martin Dennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mailman Users
>
>
> To:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Subject:
> Re: [Mailman-Users] Filter based on message text
> From:
> Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:53:49 -0800
> To:
> Martin Dennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mailman Users
>
>
> To:
>
Hi
Just wondering if it's possible (via spam filters?) to take action on a
mail depending on text found in the body of an email? Had a quick check
of the FAQ's and didn't see anything that looked applicable. I don't
have command line access
Rgds
MD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Subject:
> [Mailman-Users] AOL Rant
> From:
> Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:03:03 -0800
> To:
> Mailman-Users@python.org
>
> To:
> Mailman-Users@python.org
>
>
> I'
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> Having added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the "List of addresses which are banned
>>
> >from membership in this mailing list.", I've still got 3 "debora"
>
>> addresses to approve.
Having added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the "List of addresses which are banned
from membership in this mailing list.", I've still got 3 "debora"
addresses to approve. Do you have any ideas?
MD
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
h
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> I'm aware of the Mailman syntax for banning domains, but I'd like to ban
>> members now whose email address *starts* with a given string! I've had a
>> lot of requests lately from "debora" to
I'm aware of the Mailman syntax for banning domains, but I'd like to ban
members now whose email address *starts* with a given string! I've had a
lot of requests lately from "debora" to join my list, always followed by
something else before the "@" and at various domains. I tried following
the
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> I've just been mailed by one of my users to say that the archive for my
>> list is not up to date. Having just checked prior to sending this, I
>> found that by clicking on the "Date" link for this mo
I've just been mailed by one of my users to say that the archive for my
list is not up to date. Having just checked prior to sending this, I
found that by clicking on the "Date" link for this month, the last
message written to it is nearly a week old. Downloading the Gzip'd text
file (which nev
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>> Brad Knowles wrote:
>>
>>> At 7:23 AM +0100 10/4/06, Martin Dennett wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> There is no other information in the bounce message, so how do I
>>&
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 7:23 AM +0100 10/4/06, Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>> There is no other information in the bounce message, so how do I
>> find out who the message is really trying to be delivered to?
>
> This kind of problem is what VERP was designed to make much eas
This one has me completely baffled. Whenever a mail is hitting one of my
lists, I'm getting an "undeliverable" bounce message. The message comes
from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and the body of the mail states:
The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following:
bhaggett (UNUSED)
H
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> You can still do it, but your Approved: line must be in a message sent
>> to the -request and with the subject of the sub-part
>> message, i.e. "confirm <40 digit hex token>" (perhaps preceded by "Re
>> :", but not by "Re : ".
>>
>
>
> I think I
Hi
I've checked the FAQ's and can't see (probably because "wood" and
"trees" springs to mind) how to approve mails without having to go to
the web to do it. The message I get telling me there's a mail awaiting
approval states:
"If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett wrote:
>
>
>> I've had mails from a number of ex-users of saying that they're told
>> they're no longer members when they try to post (they're not!) but that
>> they can still see the archives. Is it just a
I've had mails from a number of ex-users of saying that they're told
they're no longer members when they try to post (they're not!) but that
they can still see the archives. Is it just a case of setting the "Is
archive file source for public or private archival?" on the Archiving
Options page t
s,
it's a definite possibility), I'd need *real* dummy instructions on how
to go about this.
Comments please.
Rgds
Martin Dennett
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ma
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Martin Dennett (Gmail) wrote:
>
>
>> Would that also be applicable to, for example, addresses after the @
>> where more than one option exists? I'm thinking of "ms*.hinet.net" -
>> I've got a lot of banned members where the &
Patrick Bogen wrote:
> On 7/8/06, Martin Dennett (Gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I add an entry into the banned
>> members list which would stop all 123abc.com members joining - in such a
>> way that I would never see the re
Patrick Bogen wrote:
> On 7/8/06, Martin Dennett (Gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I add an entry into the banned
>> members list which would stop all 123abc.com members joining - in such a
>> way that I would never see the re
Probably in common with most list admins, I get lots of requests to join
from spam addresses. A lot of these seem to be from the same domain name
for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I add an entry into the banned
members list which would stop all 123abc.com members joining - in such a
way th
just closing the browser window, but most of the users of my list
wouldn't think of that ;-)
Rgds
Martin Dennett
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman
Jon Harris wrote:
>Hi List
>
>After about a year of trying, I think I have finally got AOL to
>whitelist my (subscription only!) mailing list :-(
>
>http://postmaster.aol.com/cgi-bin/whitelist.pl (if anyone is interested)
>
>In the mailing list I have around 1500 members with aol addresses with
deas please?
Regards
Martin Dennett
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archi
to subscribe to the topic that I've set up specificially to be able
to contact them all.
Is there a way to force everybody to subscribe to a topic when they
first join the list, as this could save a lot of time in the future?
Regards
Martin Dennett
-
Dave Dewey wrote:
Quoting Heather Madrone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This has been happening on and off for some time. There's no good
way to tell which address is reporting the list as spam (AOL certainly
won't tell you), so it cannot be easily removed.
Actually there is. If you use VERP and
Hi All
I'm new to this, so go easy on me!
I've searched the archives and not found what I'm looking for, so maybe
somebody out there can explain it in terms so that I can understand ;-)
Having just moved a list over from Yahoo, I'd like to be able to still
reach users who are set to No Email. Ya
38 matches
Mail list logo
