[Mailman-Users] Retaining subscription confirmation messages

2004-04-07 Thread Mark Geisinger
Greetings! Using Mailman 2.1.3 + Exim 4.30, I don't see a way to retain subscription confirmation messages. I've found some discussion of matching date+time in MM's subscribe log with the local MTA log as evidence of confirmation that includes the originating IP, but that seems like a half measure

Re[2]: [Mailman-Users] Re: autorespond_requests in 2.1x

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Geisinger
On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 7:41:41 AM, you wrote: > That should be fixed in MM2.1 final. You'll get just one response. Very cool, Barry. Thanks much! -- Best regards, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: [Mailman-Users] Re: autorespond_requests in 2.1x

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Geisinger
On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 12:30:45 AM, you wrote: > And we've had in 2.0.x subscribers fail to confirm because (as of 2.0.6, > anyhow), the request could easily be misread as an acknowledgement. We hacked > the message a little to make it more obvious. (Old news now.) Darn pesky users. ;} I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: autorespond_requests in 2.1x

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Geisinger
Sunday, December 29, 2002, 2:06:27 PM, you wrote: >>>>>> "MG" == Mark Geisinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > MG> Is autorespond_requests broken in 2.1x, or do I perhaps > MG> misunderstand its purpose? I'm using 2.1b4 and would like to

[Mailman-Users] autorespond_requests in 2.1x

2002-12-08 Thread Mark Geisinger
Greetings! Is autorespond_requests broken in 2.1x, or do I perhaps misunderstand its purpose? I'm using 2.1b4 and would like to avoid having a request autoresponse sent to a subscribe request, or for any other request. What's happening is that anything send to the -subscribe, or -request, aliases