Re: [Mailman-Users] Backup user list

On Sep 4, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: At 11:17 AM -0700 2004-09-04, fredimac wrote: Is there a way to backup the user list in Mailman? See . Try list_members. That is, unfortunately, only a partial solution as

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination

On Jul 8, 2004, at 1:23 PM, Young, Darren wrote: Can anyone explain this message: List:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) Reason: Message has implicit destination Thanks. Someone BCC'd the list instead of listing it on the To or CC lines. It gets

Re: [Mailman-Users] multiple deliveries

On Jul 7, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Robert Ransom wrote: Every once in a while I have gotten a subscriber who say he has received like 70 copies of the same posting. Is this a quirk of mailman or something else? Have you verified in your mail logs that your server actually sent the subscriber that many

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email domain issue with virtual hosting

On Apr 25, 2004, at 8:43 PM, Mark Dadgar wrote: However, administrative emails are sent with the following headers: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Announce post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] requires approval Date: April 25, 2004 4:09:57 PM PDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note the

[Mailman-Users] Email domain issue with virtual hosting

So I looked through the archives and couldn't find a solution to this. Google was no help, either. I have Mailman setup on www.justracing.com, which is also the mailserver (sendmail) for the domain of the same name. I have volunteered to host a mailing list for the Golden Gate Chapter of of t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate Admin Messages

On Feb 5, 2004, at 9:42 AM, Mark Dadgar wrote: One of my lists is suddenly producing duplicate admin messages. I get two copies of each message. I've never seen this before I upgraded to RHEL 3.1 a week or so ago. Only one list is affected. So I figured this out. My address was list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Reply to list

On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Paul H Byerly wrote: My apologies for bringing it up at all!! Agreed! My apologies to everyone for posting a cranky note last night and really getting the ball rolling. Personally I am very happy with Mailman, and I find most of the settings easy to unders

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Reply to list

On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:27 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: Not to mention a system administrator's worst nightmare... I am a SAGE Level IV system administrator, with fifteen years of experience, and I've helped build some of the biggest mail systems on the planet -- and various other related projects. Coo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:09 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: At the end of the day, though, it doesn't really matter what the size of the list is, PROVIDED that you can tailer the software appropriately to your intended use. You are advocating making that impossible. No, I'm not. I am not advocating that

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:14 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: LOL! You are a defense attorney's worst nightmare! My wife is a general counsel of a company with hundreds of billions of euros of daily turnover, and over ten trillions of euros of assets under management. It used to be owned by one of the bigg

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

On Feb 5, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: And I had much correspondence since 1996: on most lists I use digest mode, counter of sent by me letters in my MUA shows currently 54532, I receive about 4.3 times more letters than I send (i.e. I received abo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

On Feb 5, 2004, at 2:27 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: You just told me in a previous email that some people cannot edit the To: line on a reply. So which is it? On the software I've seen, you can't change the To: line in a reply, but you can add other addresses in the Cc: line. Yes, but in the text

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

On Feb 5, 2004, at 12:09 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: Additionally, a lot of folks don't want a private copy plus one to the list - and done as the author suggests there is no quick and easy way to send to the list only. Related to what you reference below, if you want to reply to just the list, al

[Mailman-Users] Duplicate Admin Messages

One of my lists is suddenly producing duplicate admin messages. I get two copies of each message. I've never seen this before I upgraded to RHEL 3.1 a week or so ago. Only one list is affected. I did a quick archive search and found nothing. There's nothing in the FAQ, either. Ideas? - Ma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:37 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: This is totally ridiculous. No. Reply-To set to the list is evil (and for God's sake actually almost no list I know of uses it). My lists use it. And my users prefer it - I know, I've asked. It's 2004. Get over it. Yes. And it should be clear

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

On Feb 4, 2004, at 10:35 PM, Thomas Hochstein wrote: I have never understood why this poster is recommended, nor why it is the default. I've been on a lot of lists, on a lot of systems, and have never been on one that defaults to sending a response only to the author of the post I am repl

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailing lists failing - URGENT (fixed)

On Feb 3, 2004, at 4:45 PM, Merle Reine wrote: It looks to have been a corrupted incoming message in the /var/lib/mailman/qfile/in directory. I could not have fixed this without Jon's expert knowledge. Did you file a bug on this? A corrupted incoming message should not take down the whole mai

[Mailman-Users] HTDig is the biggest POS

So I'm using Mailman 2.1.4 with Mr. Barrett's excellent htdig patches and things were good. My users love it. Then I made the (forced) migration yesterday from RedHat9 to RedHat Enterprise Linux ES 3.1 (thanks RedHat ). Now I get a segmentation fault from htfuzzy every time nightly_htdig runs

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.4 - sendmail taking time delivering mail

On Jan 15, 2004, at 8:49 AM, Noah wrote: okay I just upgraded to mailman-2.1.4 and now it is taking minutes to send out 135 messages. It appears to be getting hung when a username is not found or some other error. this never happened with mailman-2.1.1 - what can I do to configure it so all th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Rotating Archives

On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:23 PM, Bryan Carbonnell wrote: I am the admin of quite a few lists and on one of the lists I want to limit the archives to the last month only. Actually the last 30 days. Is this possible? I am running 2.1.1 (soon to be 2.1.4 with Richard Barrett's excelent patches for HTDig i

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM 2.1.4 compatible mailman-htdig integration patches

On Jan 2, 2004, at 7:50 AM, Richard Barrett wrote: I have now updated a number of my Mailman patches to be MM 2.1.4 compatible and where possible uploaded the revised versions to sourceforge. THANK YOU, Richard! - Mark - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [Mailman-Users] adding subscriber names

On Dec 4, 2003, at 8:23 AM, John Smith wrote: I have a question: is there a method to add the subscriber names, in addition to e-mail addresses, en masse? That would be really usefule to me. List the names in this format: Real Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It'll add both to the database. - Mark ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

Implicit Destination means the list address is not present in either to To: or CC: lines in a posting. It typically means that someone BCC'd the list. It's forbidden because it's a common spam technique.. - Mark On Nov 13, 2003, at 3:18 AM, Rejean Proulx wrote: What does implicit destinati

[Mailman-Users] Digest Log File

So throught the last couple of Mailman releases (I'm currently running 2.1.3), my digest log file stay empty (even though I have users in digest mode). Anyone know why that is? I'm assuming that at least something should be written there when a digest is generated, etc., no? - Mark, curious -

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM 2.1.3 version Mailman-htdig integration patches available

On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 01:58 PM, Richard Barrett wrote: I have uploaded updated files to sourceforge for the following patches and bugs I maintain, which include my Mailman-HTdig integration patches. You can reach them through: [munch] #444879 - Archive indexer control to improve ind

Re: [Mailman-Users] Hotmail and Yahoo sending mail straight tojunk folders.

Raquel Rice at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> It seems that hotmail and yahoo are sending mail from mailman >> straight to junk folders, this is REAL bad, especially because >> it's possible to delete junk folders without actually looking in >> them. >> >> Why is this, is this because there is a bulk

[Mailman-Users] List admin addresses bounce

I'm using Mailman 2.1.2 (installed from source) and Sendmail (RedHat RPM). I have the appropriate aliases installed for each list I run (as output by Mailman during list creation) and things have been peachy keen for a year now. However, I just discovered that email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] generates

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman python process out of control 2.1.2

Benjamin Ash at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It looks like a mailman 2.1.2 process has been running for days, using > 99% of the cpu. > > I have restarted the mailman qrunner serveral times, but the python > process jumps up immediately to 99%. > > Any ideas what could be causing this, I am running

[Mailman-Users] HTDIG patches! Arghh!

Richard Barrett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am kicking. I have been publishing and maintaining patches to integrate > htdig search with MM since MM 2.0.6 and none of the MM support lists use > the facility. When I asked thru this list how many people used the patches > I got 3 replies; so obvio

Re: [Mailman-Users] Excessive cpu usage

Arnar Birgisson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm running mailman 2.1 on a linux machine. My problem is that the > mailman qrunner daemon constantly consumes 65-95% of cpu time. Nothing > shows up in the logs while this goes on. Any ideas of how to locate the > fault? Is there a massively large (l