2004, at 02:50, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
>
> > Normally, i thought that inputing the full email address
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the mailman privacy
> > options for aliases that shouldn't be held when there is implicit
> > destination would allow it to post the mes
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:26:28 -0500, Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2004, at 1:22 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> > The admin of the list isn't me, i just admin the physical box, and the
> > list admin is afraid of spam, so he wants to have
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:11:08 -0500, Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 2, 2004, at 12:50 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> > The problem is that all the mail for the list is
> > always held for approval because of the implicit destination.
> >
>
>
Greetings,
I've got a mailman list (version 2.0.14) behind a firewall. As a
result, anyone trying to send mail to that list sends it to an
external email address which is of the format:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That address then gets translated internally and forwards the mail to
the mailman list. The
