Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

2004-06-03 Thread Lonni J Friedman
2004, at 02:50, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > > Normally, i thought that inputing the full email address > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the mailman privacy > > options for aliases that shouldn't be held when there is implicit > > destination would allow it to post the mes

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

2004-06-02 Thread Lonni J Friedman
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:26:28 -0500, Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 2, 2004, at 1:22 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > The admin of the list isn't me, i just admin the physical box, and the > > list admin is afraid of spam, so he wants to have

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

2004-06-02 Thread Lonni J Friedman
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:11:08 -0500, Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2004, at 12:50 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > The problem is that all the mail for the list is > > always held for approval because of the implicit destination. > > > >

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

2004-06-02 Thread Lonni J Friedman
Greetings, I've got a mailman list (version 2.0.14) behind a firewall. As a result, anyone trying to send mail to that list sends it to an external email address which is of the format: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That address then gets translated internally and forwards the mail to the mailman list. The