Lawrence Bowie wrote:
> One of my lists is discarding messages for some reason.
> THe vette file looks like the following ..
>
>
> Aug 10 18:52:42 2006 (5414) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Aug 10 18:55:43 2006 (5414) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMA
One of my lists is discarding messages for some reason.
THe vette file looks like the following ..
Aug 10 18:52:42 2006 (5414) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aug 10 18:55:43 2006 (5414) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am subscribed to the list. I suspect someone r
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
> Whenever a user sends to my lists from his account he does NOT
> receive his own post but yet
>
> New_members_options -> Do not send a copy of member's own post
>
> is NOT checked.
>
> Could it be that it was once chec
Whenever a user sends to my lists from his account he does NOT
receive his own post but yet
New_members_options -> Do not send a copy of member's own post
is NOT checked.
Could it be that it was once checked?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Use
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>OK .. I am just now noticing this on my lists.
>>The To: field on all my lists have
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>instead of
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Although, I am
OK .. I am just now noticing this on my lists.
The To: field on all my lists have
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although, I am sending it to lists.example.org.
Is this a postfix or a mailman configuration issue?
Thanks,
LDB
--
ult to 'Reject', but send a message to the
> sender, indicating that their message was rejected because either they are
> not a member or their address has changed. One problem with this solution is
> that the option for multiple languages becomes a bit of an issue.
>
> On 7/
I have been rejecting messages from non-members but I am
not sure that is the best practice. Is it better to "discard"
rather than "reject" non-members messages?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.pyth
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>>Is bounce processing turned off for the list and not just
>>>DEFAULT_BOUNCE_PROCESSING = No in mm_cfg.py?
>>
>>Does not exists anywhere in my config.
>
>
>
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>I do not have bounce processing enabled but yet one morning
>>I have a list of about 15 users unsubscribed from the list.
>>According to logs, they all look like this,
>>
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] auto
I do not have bounce processing enabled but yet one morning
I have a list of about 15 users unsubscribed from the list.
According to logs, they all look like this,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] auto-unsubscribed [reason: BYBOUNCE]
This obviously says it was removed because of some
measure of bounces were
I have a mailing list that will not accept a specific
HTML message from a subscribing user. It will accept
other messages but not this particular. I tested the
message against a test list and the message posted just
fine. So, I can probably conclude that there is
something wrong with that particula
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
> I have a message in the vette directory labeled:
>
> Message has implicit destination
>
> The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve?
>
> Thanks,
>
> LDB
>
> --
I have a message in the vette directory labeled:
Message has implicit destination
The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.or
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>>What does scripts/paths.py now contain?
>>>
>>
>># -*- python -*-
>>
>># Copyright (C) 1998-2003 by the Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>#
>>#
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>>You may have a syntax error (typo) in scripts/paths.py. Try just running
>>>
>>>python scripts.paths.py
>>>
>>>It should exit without printing anythin
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>>Did you add "import japanese" to bin/paths.py or was it already there?
>>>
>>>If you added it, you also have to add it to scripts/paths.py and
>>>cron/p
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>>Back again .. The posts are working but the admin. interface page is not
>>working
>>and it is displaying the following message in the browser ...
>>
>>
>>Bug in Mailman version 2.1.6
>>
>>We&#x
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If you have everything but the pythonlib/japanese/ directory, you can
>>>unpack the JapaneseCodecs-1.4.11.tar.gz, cd to the unpack directory
>>>and run
>>>
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>>If you have everything but the pythonlib/japanese/ directory, you can
>>unpack the JapaneseCodecs-1.4.11.tar.gz, cd to the unpack directory
>>and run
>>
>>python ./setup.py build
>>
>>This will create a 'build/' subdir which contains a lib*/ subdir which
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>LookupError: unknown encoding: japanese.euc-jp
>>
>>
>>
>>I have the above error in my logs. I need this Japanese encoding but my SuSE
>>10.0 dist does not stock it. Where can I find it so mailm
Jun 14 20:49:14 2006 (19227) Uncaught runner exception: unknown encoding:
japanese.euc-jp
Jun 14 20:49:14 2006 (19227) Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 111, in _oneloop
self._onefile(msg, msgdata)
File "/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Que
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>I have been getting rid of lists lately and I need
>>to forward old lists to the new lists. I am using
>>mailman 2.1.6 and the forwards are not working.
>>I also recently upgraded the OS from Debian to SuSE 10.0.
I have been getting rid of lists lately and I need
to forward old lists to the new lists. I am using
mailman 2.1.6 and the forwards are not working.
I also recently upgraded the OS from Debian to SuSE 10.0.
Any ideas anyone??
Thanks,
LDB
--
Ma
In moving from Debian to SuSE 10.0, the mailing lists' links like,
http://lists.example.org/cgi-bin/mailman/admindb/test-list
do not work anymore because the actual link on the new server is
http://lists.example.org/mailman/admindb/test-list
I can take care of this via apache but there has to
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
> Anyone out there using the above script on SuSE 10.0 to protect
> their mailing lists? I keep getting the below errors after the mailing lists
> move.
>
>
> D67F4580B8 2239 Tue Jun 6 22:38:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (temporary fa
Anyone out there using the above script on SuSE 10.0 to protect
their mailing lists? I keep getting the below errors after the mailing lists
move.
D67F4580B8 2239 Tue Jun 6 22:38:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(temporary failure. Command output: exceptions.OSError [Errno 2] No such file
or
directo
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
> Jun 6 22:07:21 mailserver postfix/local[3100]: D7F6F580BB:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=local, delay=1, status=SOFTBOUNCE
> (Command died with status 1: "/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post test-list")
>
>
>
> I keep getting t
Jun 6 22:07:21 mailserver postfix/local[3100]: D7F6F580BB:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=local, delay=1, status=SOFTBOUNCE
(Command died with status 1: "/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post test-list")
I keep getting the above in postfix logs and my lists are not working. Is this
due to name o
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>> I have a user telling me ..
>>
>> It looks like the pipermail installation is hosed in some interesting way.
>> The emails that I send have both text/html and text/multipart sections.
>> It scrubbed the text/ht
I have a user telling me ..
It looks like the pipermail installation is hosed in some interesting way.
The emails that I send have both text/html and text/multipart sections.
It scrubbed the text/html part, but didn't bother including the text/plain part.
But yet ...
Default.py:
DEFAULT_PASS_MI
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>> Is it acceptable to forward old lists that are not used anymore to one
>> single list?
>
>
> I'm not sure what you're getting at or what result you want, but if you
> mean could you set MTA aliases for se
Is it acceptable to forward old lists that are not used anymore to one single
list?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>> What is the easist way to globally filter email marked SPAM?
>
> Assuming you mean in Mailman, use the KNOWN_SPAMMERS list in mm_cfg.py,
> e.g.
>
> KNOWN_SPAMMERS = [('subject', '^.*spam'), ('x-
What is the easist way to globally filter email marked SPAM?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchabl
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> In the vette log, I am seeing these messages from the automatic posts ...
>>
>>
>> Feb 06 06:13:14 2006 (17698) mail-list post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] held,
>> message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Message has impli
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> In which queue do you find it?
>>>
>> the out queue
>>
>>> Are there any relevant messages in any of Mailman's logs, particularly
>>> 'locks', 'qrun
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> In which queue do you find it?
>>>
>> the out queue
>>
>>> Are there any relevant messages in any of Mailman's logs, particularly
>>> 'locks', 'qrun
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> In which queue do you find it?
>>>
>> the out queue
>>
>>> Are there any relevant messages in any of Mailman's logs, particularly
>>> 'locks', 'qrun
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>These are message Mailman has in its qfiles that PostFix
>>>>does not know about.
>>>
>>> In which qfiles? If it i
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie
>> I have not tried the above but it is asking for confirmation because the
>> posts
>> are from legitimate automatic engines that send email. The list does not
>> know
>> how to distinguish between SPAM and a legitimate a
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>>
>> 3) When typing, mailq, on the server, it does not list the corresponding
>> held messages. These are message Mailman has in its qfiles that PostFix
>> does not know about.
>
>
> In which q
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>>> If that's what you want, you need to set Privacy options...->Sender
>>> filters->generic_nonmember_action) to Reject.
>>>
>> Does not work? I was hoping there was something I was missing but
>
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>> I am having trouble figuring why when a message from a non-member sent to my
>> lists does not immediately bounce back to the sender saying, "You are not a
>> member".
>
>
> If that's what you
I am having trouble figuring why when a message from a non-member sent to my
lists does not immediately bounce back to the sender saying, "You are not a
member".
Also, I have a lot of held messages in qfiles/*/* and data/*. How can I
manually
process those?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the subscribed address.
>>
>>
>> The headers are as follows:
>>
>>
>> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 19:25:04 2006
>> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> X-O
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> OK .. Here is the reason it says ..
>>
>>
>> Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
>>
>>
>> but he is a member of the list. Are headers necessary for you guys to see?
>
>
> On 28 Jan,2006, at 1:32 AM, Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>>>> I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve
>>>> their posts
>>>> for some reason.
>>>
>>>
&g
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>>> OK .. Here is the reason it says ..
>>>
>>>
>>> Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
>>>
>>>
>>> but he is a member of the list.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> OK .. Here is the reason it says ..
>>
>>
>> Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
>>
>>
>> but he is a member of the list. Are headers necessary for you guys to see?
>
>
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
>> posts
>> for some reason.
>
>
> For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
>
>
>> And when I do have it accept t
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>>> I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
>>> posts
>>> for some reason.
>>
>> For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
>>
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
>> posts
>> for some reason.
>
>
> For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
>
>
>> And when I do have it accept t
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>> I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
>> posts
>> for some reason.
>
>
> For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
>
>
>> And when I do have it accept t
Team:
I have some issues with my mailing list.
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their posts
for some reason. And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me to apporove it. Any ideas???
Thanks,
LDB
-
Glenn Sieb wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie said the following on 1/20/2006 7:26 PM:
>> If create a mailing list called test-list, then do I have to create aliases
>> like this
>
> Hey Lawrence!
>
> If you take a look in $PREFIX/mailman/data/aliases, you'll see that
>
If create a mailing list called test-list, then do I have to create aliases
like this
mailman: "|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post mailman"
mailman-admin:"|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman admin mailman"
mailman-bounces: "|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailm
Excellent!!! That is the answer I was expecting. Thank you very much for
the clear explanation.
LDB
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>>The above are missing for several of my mailing lists. How do I remedy
>>this dilemma? Do I HAVE to recreate the lists?
>
&g
The above are missing for several of my mailing lists. How do I remedy
this dilemma? Do I HAVE to recreate the lists?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailm
59 matches
Mail list logo
