> Lachlan Michael wrote:
>>
>>One more data point. An attachment of 500-600kB was ok, but an attachment
>>of 1.5MB was not.
>>
>>For the 1.5MB file case, the memory errors just kept coming until the
>> .bak
>>file was left in place, and not moved away.
>
>>> Prior to Mailman 2.1.9, the error would have occurred once and the
>>> message would have been lost. Beginning in 2.1.9, a queue file
>>> backup/recovery mechanism was implemented which allowed messages that
>>> were in process when a crash occurred to be recovered, but the problem
>>> here
>> Prior to Mailman 2.1.9, the error would have occurred once and the
>> message would have been lost. Beginning in 2.1.9, a queue file
>> backup/recovery mechanism was implemented which allowed messages that
>> were in process when a crash occurred to be recovered, but the problem
>> here is that
Mark Sapiro さんは書きました:
> Lachlan Michael wrote:
>
>> I have a problem when using mailman. The problem manifests itself when a
>> user sends a largish attachment (say 300kB) such as a digital camera
>> picture to a list. The lists I run are small private groups and if
>
Dear Mailman List,
I have a problem when using mailman. The problem manifests itself when a
user sends a largish attachment (say 300kB) such as a digital camera
picture to a list. The lists I run are small private groups and if
possible I would like to allow users to send these kind of attachment
