Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Bottom line - external messages to -owner are different from internally
> crafted notices to the owner. The former have envelope sender of
> -bounces@ and the latter have
> envelope sender of -bounces@.
>
> Nothing has changed in the way these messages from Mailman have been
>
00
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:13:39 -0400
From: Kris Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: ReefNet Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Test message to fubar-owner
Content-Type: text/
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> If the bounce is reported directly back to Mailman as a
> reject at the SMTP level, there should be something in Mailman's
> smtp-failure log.
B-I-N-G-O (I think)! The smtp-failure log has entries like:
Apr 27 01:20:09 2006 (12765) All recipients refused: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
First of all, thanks again for your help. Although my problem isn't
solved yet, you've given me a much better understanding of how Mailman
works.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Check Mailman's bounce log (if you can). When you send to -admin there
> should be an entry
>
> bounce message w/no discernabl
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the detailed info. Much appreciated.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Short answer... The -admin address is a synonym for the -bounces
> address.
I discovered this myself just now as I looked at the contents of the
"admin" and "bounces" scripts in the scripts directory.
> This leads me
without a solution:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2003-May/028650.html
I'm ready to pull my hair out!
Kris Wilk
ReefNet Inc.
www.reefnet.ca
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org
