"kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> 7 hours now and counting... am i the only one on this list?!
> >
> > No, I think it just means no on has an answer for you.
> >
> > Have you tried putting some debugging prints into the code or
> > an
"kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 7 hours now and counting... am i the only one on this list?!
No, I think it just means no on has an answer for you.
Have you tried putting some debugging prints into the code or
anything?
-Karl
> > uhhh... it's going close to 5 1/2 hours now! i n
Two things I left out of this previous message:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2005-January/041687.html
1. We fixed an apparent coding error in /usr/lib/mailman/bin/update.
On line 556, we changed "addr = data[0].address" to "addr = data[0]",
since data[0] was already an
ally a
no-op, but the point is that all the post-install configuration stuff
runs smoothly). Brian and I expect future 'apt-get install mailman'
invocations to work as well, based on what apt-get seems to be trying
to do. But who knows, we could be wrong :-).
Best,
-Karl Fogel and Bri
