Re: [Mailman-Users] problems up through 2.1b1

2002-04-19 Thread Justin Sheehy
Message to self: RTFM. More appropriately: Read the Fine NEWS File The bounce problem was due to not having switched "wrapper" to "mailman" in my aliases. Now, the problem is somewhat different. Mail to all of the various mailman-managed addresses goes through. I get many lines of the followi

[Mailman-Users] problems up through 2.1b1

2002-04-19 Thread Justin Sheehy
I was having some problems with one of the cgis under 2.1a2, but that sort of thing is to be expected with an alpha release. I figured that I'd upgrade to 2.1b1 to see if it helped. Well, it changed the problem. All mail to any mailman/wrapper managed addresses now bounce like so:

[Mailman-Users] exception in mailman 2.1a2

2002-03-01 Thread Justin Sheehy
My mailman installation has worked fine for months. Today I added a new list and a number of people were subscribed to it. I didn't change anything at all in the basic mailman config, just in that list. Now, the web interface throws an exception on the "membership list" page every time it is ac

[Mailman-Users] thttpd

2001-12-01 Thread Justin Sheehy
Several months ago I sent mail to mailman-users when I was trying to figure out how to get Mailman to run under thttpd. I figured it out fairly quickly, but forgot to post the answer back here. I'm doing so now, for the benefit of others who might want to run Mailman on thttpd. I copied the cgi

Re: [Mailman-Users] thttpd?

2001-06-29 Thread Justin Sheehy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry A. Warsaw) writes: > Really? I think the CGI/1.1 "spec" (which really never got past draft > status) description of SCRIPT_NAME and PATH_INFO definitely allow for > Apache's behavior here. You're right, it does allow it. It certainly doesn't require it, but it doesn't

Re: [Mailman-Users] thttpd?

2001-06-28 Thread Justin Sheehy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry A. Warsaw) writes: > I've no direct experience with thttpd, but if it supports the > "standard" CGI interface, it should be fine. If you do run into any > gotchas (or even if it works fine), let us know and I'll add some text > to the documentation. So, it looks like th

Re: [Mailman-Users] thttpd?

2001-06-28 Thread Justin Sheehy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry A. Warsaw) writes: > I've no direct experience with thttpd, but if it supports the > "standard" CGI interface, it should be fine. If you do run into any > gotchas (or even if it works fine), let us know and I'll add some text > to the documentation. It supports the CGI

[Mailman-Users] thttpd?

2001-06-28 Thread Justin Sheehy
Hello, A quick scan of the archives and the FAQ didn't turn anything up, so I thought I'd ask this here. Is anyone known to be using Mailman with thttpd? If so, are there any known gotchas or things to look out for? I can't think of a reason why it wouldn't work, but since the Mailman docs see