Re: [Mailman-Users] Bad archive count - BUG

2001-02-19 Thread Jonathan Lundell
987?B?sejI8cO1?=) >>2. Adding and removing *single* users from command line... (Mike Cisar) >>3. Re: Mail headers with Mailman (John Vorstermans) >>4. Re: Mail headers with Mailman (Jonathan Lundell) >>5. Re: Mail headers with Mailman (Roger B.A. Klorese) &g

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mail headers with Mailman

2001-02-18 Thread Jonathan Lundell
s not been a universal assumption, so if there are others, let's hear about them. (And there's nothing required of an MUA in 2369; just some suggestions on how a mail client might treat them. Is there a client that doesn anything but display the headers, possibly clickable?) -- /J

Re: [Mailman-Users] Stupid Headers

2001-02-16 Thread Jonathan Lundell
be for a three-way option: in the headers, as now; moved to a sig; and turned off altogether. To my mind this kind of flexibility makes Mailman better. -- /Jonathan Lundell. -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.or

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mail headers with Mailman

2001-02-15 Thread Jonathan Lundell
ders including the "boring" ones. Adopting an RFC would be good, yes. If somebody posted a pointer to a draft of the RFC, I missed it -- /Jonathan Lundell. -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

Re: [Mailman-Users] email addresses

2001-02-12 Thread Jonathan Lundell
>such as: > > "Jonathan Lundell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jonathan Lundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Jonathan Lundell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >It'd be convenient. > >If the latter, is there a mechanism for changing a user address for the pu

[Mailman-Users] email addresses

2001-02-11 Thread Jonathan Lundell
When interacting with the mailman web interface and entering an email address (say when adding a new user, or entering an explicit reply-to address, am I limited to the actual email address (say [EMAIL PROTECTED]), or can I use any RFC822-legal format, such as: "Jonathan Lu