On May 30, 2008, at 11:00 AM, David Newman wrote:
On 5/30/08 4:35 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still
assoc
On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 4/18/2008, Jonathan Dill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> If you are using a separate e-mail relay, could also be firewall
>> issue,
>
> Is there by any chance a CISCO router in the mix anywhere?
Yes exactly, I have
On Apr 18, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Darren G Pifer wrote:
>>
>> I am seeing these errors in the smtp-failure log:
>>
>> Apr 18 09:11:30 2008 (1231) Low level smtp error: (104, 'Connection
>> reset by peer'), msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Apr 18 09:13:42 2008 (19445) delivery to [EM
On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:29 AM, Darren G Pifer wrote:
> We have a list that we use for keeping backup logs and sometimes these
> logs get rather large. The list is moderated and sometimes the size
> of
> the message goes beyond the "Maximum length in KB of message body"
> which
> requires appro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi people, just a begginer question :
>
> if i send a wrong message to a mailman list, there is a way to stop
> delivering this message?
>
Unless you have a slow server, a very large mailing lists, or a slow
internet connection, by the time that you decide to stop t
Martin S wrote:
> Is it possible to integrate Mailman with AD (preferably) or OpenLDAP? Anyone
> tried doing this somewhere?
> I'll have a number of users in AD which will form base for three systems.
> Now there is talk of integrating email list functionality into the system,
> and as I have some
Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Im using mailman 2.1.9, and ive got close to 100 mail lists on it.
>
> We just have had one of our IT guys leave our company, and I was wondering if
> there was an easy (bulk, cli) way to remove/change the email address from the
> "List of Administrators" (2n
Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
> Which method would be best suited for that scenario?
> Also, is any of the script destructive to the lists themselves? Ie, if it
> didn't run right or something it wouldn't affect the list accepting emails to
> it, or blowing away the rest of the list config?
>
That's
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
>
> How was the "opt-in" done? Was it done with Mailman's confirmation
> process, or would it have been possible for person A to accidently or
> maliciously get person B on the list? If the latter, I would consider
> the list mailing unacceptable.
If the list was hoste
Brad Knowles wrote:
> Well, you haven't really given us any real details as to the nature of
> the problem or the nature of the complaints. So, I'm not sure that
> anyone can give you any advice that will be useful.
>
> I can say that I'd expect to see more support from your new ISP, and
> if t
Greetings,
I hope this is not too OT, hopefully someone here has had a similar
experience and can offer some practical advice, I'm not sure what to
tell this customer at this point.
I have a customer who has a fairly large opt-in only mailman mailing
list (~40,000 subscribers) that they use to
Harold Paulson wrote:
> away. All of the normal posts would go right through. Members who
> send from the wrong account would get the usual Mailman notice.
> Occasionally wrong-account-posters would have to wait a long time on
> their notice.
>
For the sender, there is a very simple sol
Greg Lindahl wrote:
> 7E7E824F81 634 Wed Mar 1 09:03:21 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (host mx3.mail.yahoo.com[67.28.113.10] said: 451 VS5-MF Excessive unknown
> recipients - possible Open Relay
> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/spam/spam-18.html (#4.4.5) 205.217.153.43
> (in reply to MAIL FROM
Are you getting explicit REJECT messages from Yahoo! or some other error?
For what it's worth, I think Yahoo may have changed something internally
lately, like their DNS MX records, you may want to check out what
address your MTA is trying to send the messages to and compare to dig or
nslookup
t;>>Hai
>>>
>>>I am getting lot spam-mails.The following are the examples.
>>>How can i stop these things!!!
>>>
>>>
>Also, it should be noted that your issue is not really a Mailman
>issue, but rather
Thanks, I just found this article, which is interesting reading... If
anybody has other relevant links, please let me know, I may put a page
on my web page or at least bookmark them in my furl.net bookmarks.
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-20060208WhitelistStaysAOLsGoodmailDanc
Sally K Scheer wrote:
> I'm not quite sure what you've just written here. What is AOL blocking?
>
If you only have a few people on your mailing list, probably nothing,
but if you cross a certain threshhold--I'm guessing either number of
messages sent from you, or number of spam complaints--AOL
Has anyone talked about the changes planned by AOL, Yahoo! etc. to
require "certification" via Goodmail or just be blocked?
http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3581301
http://www.goodmailsystems.com/
What will happen to a mailing list such as this one? Will AOL and
Yahoo! users just be out
Hi folks,
I have Mailman 2.1.7 and I have already shut down the queue daemons, but
I am looking how to abort the mailing and stop any more messages from
going out. The list has about 45,000 subscribers, and it looks like a
fair number of requests haven't been forwarded to postfix yet.
Thanks,
Speaking ripe from experience, the Mailman FAQ suggests turning on
"disable_dns_lookups = yes" to improve the performance of Postfix with
Mailman, which kind of makes sense. BUT in Postfix, this disables all
MX lookups. So, unless you are going indirectly through a relay that is
going to hand
Hi folks,
I have Mailman 2.1.7 and I have already shut down the queue daemons, but
I am looking how to abort the mailing and stop any more messages from
going out. The list has about 45,000 subscribers, and it looks like a
fair number of requests haven't been forwarded to postfix yet.
Thanks,
Jo
> Troy wrote:
> After I added an Explicit Reply to Address, I could not delete it out
> again, and changing the Directed field to "Poster" didn't seem to
> help either.
>
> Is this a bug, does anyone know of a fix or work around?
I am definitely not a guru, but I would login as the mailman use
The only thing I can guess is:
1) some spammer is using mailman-users as a return e-mail address
2) someone has somehow managed to maliciously subscribe you to some
mailing lists
3) you somehow managed to subscribe yourself to the mailing list
I have forwarded your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 matches
Mail list logo
