> As I said a few messages ago, if lists did more stringent tests on
> incoming mail, a lot of this complexity could be avoided,
I don't understand this. If lists got a pass, every spam would grow
RFC 2369 header fields. No?
Large mail systems already know where all the mailing lists are. It
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > 'from' address to yourself (or a special-purpose mailbox, or
> > something)? This would require only changes to stuff you made
> > yourself (the usenet -> list processing).
>
> I'd think the answer was obvious: Because I didn't write the messag
Why not, when sending usenet posts to the list, merely change the 'from' address
to yourself (or a special-purpose mailbox, or something)? This would require only
changes to stuff you made yourself (the usenet -> list processing).
I'd think the answer was obvious: Because I didn't write the m
1. It confuses the h### out of naive users (typically those from
offending domains).
2. Some users from offending domains b loudly about having their
addresses "deprecated".
I've been doing this for the better part of a year, with some very
non-technical users on lists for my church
