Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman archive messages(not rm, but install!)

>>>>> "Brad" == Brad Knowles >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman archive messages(not rm, but install!)" >>>>> Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:28:19 -0600 Brad> At 10:17 PM -0500 12/8/06, John A. Martin wrote: >> >> I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman archive messages(not rm, but install!)

Mailman-Users] Mailman archive messages(not rm, but install!)" >>>>> Fri, 8 Dec 2006 07:52:33 -0500 Paul> Quoting Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> At 11:43 AM -0500 12/8/06, John A. Martin wrote: >> > See <http://packages.debian.org/unstabl

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman archive messages(not rm, but install!)

> "Brad" == Brad Knowles > "Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman archive messages(not rm, but install!)" > Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:52:26 -0600 Brad> At 7:52 AM -0500 12/8/06, Alan McConnell quoted me: >>> Uh, what version of Mailman is that? I thought that Mailman >>> had fully integra

Re: [Mailman-Users] Difficulties with mailman 2.1.5

> "Brad" == Brad Knowles > "Re: [Mailman-Users] Difficulties with mailman 2.1.5" > Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:52:50 -0600 Brad> What really needs to happen is the Debian guys need to get Brad> 2.1.9 and "Debian-ize" that codebase, and then ship that out Brad> to all their custome

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam, spamcop and mailman moderation

>>>>> "Brad" == Brad Knowles >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] spam, spamcop and mailman moderation" >>>>> Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:56:36 -0600 Brad> At 11:17 AM -0500 11/11/06, John A. Martin wrote: >> Perhaps amend Char

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam, spamcop and mailman moderation

> "Brad" == Brad Knowles > "Re: [Mailman-Users] spam, spamcop and mailman moderation" > Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:51:55 -0600 Brad> At 11:45 AM -0500 11/10/06, Charles Gregory wrote: >> The only suggestion I can come up with is some simple >> last-minute filtering within mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

> "JC" == JC Dill > "Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane" > Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:41:30 -0700 JC> Ask me if you can borrow my car, and I might say yes and give JC> you the keys. Take my car without asking, that's theft. >> >> Gmane subscribes to lists. When the list

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

> "JC" == JC Dill > "Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane" > Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:55:37 -0700 JC> Barry Warsaw wrote: >> If I was aware of such problems in the past, I honestly don't >> remember -- I'll place the blame squarely on my overloaded >> brain, and age. :) Ta

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

> "Tokio" == Tokio Kikuchi > "Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane" > Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:20:56 +0900 Tokio> Jason R. Mastaler wrote: >> On 9/17/06 9:36 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >>> Taking a fresh look at this, I say let's do what we can to get >>> the lists on Gmane,

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

>>>>> "Brad" == Brad Knowles >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?" >>>>> Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:27:41 +0100 Brad> At 10:06 PM -0500 2006-02-15, John A. Martin wrote: >> Absent a searchable archive, would you like to gi

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

>>>>> "sjt" == Stephen J Turnbull >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?" >>>>> Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:56:46 +0900 >>>>> "jam" == John A Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: sjt> I missed at least one

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

> "JC" == JC Dill > "Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?" > Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:45:44 -0800 JC> When we first asked Gmane to not gateway this list, one of the JC> issues was that while our own archives munge the email address JC> of list posters, the Gmane feed didn't do any mungin

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

>>>>> "Brad" == Brad Knowles >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?" >>>>> Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:29:55 +0100 Brad> At 10:07 PM -0500 2006-02-15, John A. Martin wrote: >> Heaven forfend! What harm will Gmane do. B

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

> "Brad" == Brad Knowles > "Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?" > Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:21:13 +0100 Brad> I'm of two minds when it comes to Gmane. Brad> On the one hand, they take our content, store a copy Brad> locally, index that local content, and then make that

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

> "Brad" == Brad Knowles > "Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?" > Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:57:24 +0100 Brad> Yes. We also care that others having their own Brad> gateways will be doing things that are out of our control, Brad> and may cause much more damage to the mailing list a

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

>>>>> "CC" == Christopher X Candreva >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?" >>>>> Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:53:37 -0500 (EST) CC> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, John A. Martin wrote: >> Not only is this list, Mailman-Use

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

> "Brad" == Brad Knowles > "Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?" > Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:21:08 +0100 Brad> At 9:41 AM -0500 2006-02-15, John Swartzentruber wrote: >> It appears that the mailman lists have disappeared from >> GMane. That's a bit inconvenient. Are there any other >

Re: [Mailman-Users] GMane?

> "John" == John Swartzentruber > "[Mailman-Users] GMane?" > Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:41:02 -0500 John> It appears that the mailman lists have disappeared from John> GMane. That's a bit inconvenient. Are there any other John> newsgroups that mirror this mailing list? I looked a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

> "jb" == John Buttery > "Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list" > Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:12:50 -0600 jb> * Buddy Logan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-08 03:15:46 jb> -0800]: >> Since this is a pet peeve of yours, maybe you should explain to >> me what is wrong with overwritin

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman problem on Debian

ssion that most Debian packagers prefer that and that the Debian packagers will pass bugs upstream when appropriate. In this case we have ,[ Message received at [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ] Received: (at 226086) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2004 17:15:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 04 11:15:5

Re: [Mailman-Users] Debian Back-Port?

>>>>> "rr" == Raquel Rice >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] Debian Back-Port?" >>>>> Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:57:52 -0800 rr> On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:56:16 -0500 rr> "John A. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Debian Back-Port?

> "rr" == Raquel Rice > "[Mailman-Users] Debian Back-Port?" > Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:07:52 -0800 rr> Does anyone know of back-ports for Debian. For stable, way too hard to be useful, IMHO. rr> current Debian stable version of Mailman is 2.0.11. But currently apt-get in

Re: [Mailman-Users] Wrapping long lines in Mailman

> "Will" == Will Froning > "[Mailman-Users] Wrapping long lines in Mailman" > Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:03:29 -0800 Will> I've seen some people's solutions in the archives using fmt Will> and piping to mailmain, but that does work in FreeBSD (seems Will> Solaris's fmt is better)

Re: [Mailman-Users] Web hosting for Mailman

> "Dale" == Dale schibbelhut > "[Mailman-Users] Web hosting for Mailman" > Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:49:03 -0600 Dale> I thought I had seen a link to hosting companies on the Dale> website but I can't find it now. http://list.org/inthenews.html jam pgp0.pgp Descript

Re: [Mailman-Users] Hosting companies

> "Dale" == Dale schibbelhut > "[Mailman-Users] Hosting companies" > Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:50:59 -0600 Dale> I am looking for a company that will host lists using Dale> mailman software. Does anybody have any recommendations. Have you looked at

Re: [Mailman-Users] PGP/Mime

> "Enno" == Enno Rehling > "[Mailman-Users] PGP/Mime" > Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:31:12 +0200 Enno> Mailman seems to re-wrap MIME messages in a way that Enno> destroys OpenPGP/Mime signed messages (see my own messages Enno> to this list). Is there any way I can fix that through

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "jam" == John A Martin >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists" >>>>> Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:34:21 -0400 jam> 2. Cause something like the followi

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Ed" == Ed Wilts > "Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists" > Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:09:46 -0500 Ed> What would one look like to allow, for example, a mail message Ed> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to only come from an

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Nuno" == Nuno Serra > "[Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists" > Wed, 13 Aug 2003 22:16:20 +0200 Nuno> Hi, SPAM email where the from address appears as the list Nuno> itself is bypassing the list rules for post

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Do I need an MX Record

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Will" == Will Yardley > "[Mailman-Users] Re: Do I need an MX Record" > Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:04:35 -0800 Will> This isn't a mailman question, but rather a MTA Will> configuration question. Often useful are the tools at

Re: [Mailman-Users] configuring Mailman

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw > "Re: [Mailman-Users] configuring Mailman" > Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:28:40 -0500 BAW> In Mailman 2.1.x the way to customize the welcome message is BAW> to create a directory lists//en (assuming English B

Re: [Mailman-Users] configuring Mailman

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw > "Re: [Mailman-Users] configuring Mailman" > Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:19:33 -0500 BAW> - Set the member_moderation_action to Reject and add a nice BAW> rejection notice text to the following text box. Say

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1 mailpasswds error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw > "Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1 mailpasswds error" > Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:39:57 -0500 BAW> see Warsaw's 4th Law. :) Pointer? ,[ Google ] | Your search - "Warsaw's 4th Law" - did not match any documents

Re: [Mailman-Users] MS Exchange as a relay computer?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Ralf" == Ralf Hildebrandt > "Re: [Mailman-Users] MS Exchange as a relay computer?" > Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:32:43 +0100 Ralf> * alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> The Mailman FAQ still recommends setting MAX_SMTP_RCPTS to 10