Re: [Mailman-Users] dmarc_moderation_action isn't working

Thus spake Mark Sapiro: > > Did you restart Mailman after installing the python-dns package? I think this was the problem---I forgot to restart Mailman after installing python-dns. It took a few days after asking about this before I got any further posts which would trigger From munging, but now

Re: [Mailman-Users] dmarc_moderation_action isn't working

Thus spake Mark Sapiro: > > What do you get on the local machine from > > dig txt _dmarc.yahoo.com [uckelman@one Mailman]$ dig txt _dmarc.yahoo.com ; <<>> DiG 9.9.4-P2-RedHat-9.9.4-12.P2.fc20 <<>> txt _dmarc.yahoo.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status:

Re: [Mailman-Users] dmarc_moderation_action isn't working

Thus spake Mark Sapiro: > On 05/29/2014 03:03 AM, Joel Uckelman wrote: > > > > Do you still think that given what I found above? > > > Did you restart Mailman after installing the python-dns package? I think so, but I have no way of checking now. > Yes, I s

Re: [Mailman-Users] dmarc_moderation_action isn't working

Thus spake Mark Sapiro: > On 05/28/2014 10:28 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > Mark Sapiro writes: > > > > > If there are no 'DMARC' entries in Mailman's logs, it most likely means > > > the imports I show above didn't succeed in the python that Mailman is > > > using, in which case dmarc_mod

Re: [Mailman-Users] dmarc_moderation_action isn't working

Thus spake Mark Sapiro: > On 05/28/2014 05:41 AM, Joel Uckelman wrote: > > > > I'm running the just-released RPM for 2.1.18 on Fedora 20. I have the > > python-dns package installed, which I read was required for DMARC > > checks. > > > The required pack

[Mailman-Users] dmarc_moderation_action isn't working

Last week I upgraded to Mailman 2.1.18 in order to get the DMARC workarounds new in that version. I set dmarc_moderation_action for my list to "Munge From" and waited to see what would happen. Despite that I seem to still be having DMARC bounces, as this morning I got 22 "Bounce action notification

Re: [Mailman-Users] broken List-archive header

Thus spake Joel Uckelman: > Yesterday I upgraded Mailman to 2.1 and started to notice the following > problem: The List-archive headers in messages coming from my lists all look > like this: > > List-archive: > > while before they looked like this, e.g.: >

[Mailman-Users] broken List-archive header

Yesterday I upgraded Mailman to 2.1 and started to notice the following problem: The List-archive headers in messages coming from my lists all look like this: List-archive: while before they looked like this, e.g.: List-archive: What's happeni

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-To option, Author Name and Archives

> Hello, > > I've searched the archives, the FAQ and google and couldn't find the answer > to this question. So, any help is appreciated. > > I'm moving our lists from Majordomo to Mailman and have set up a test list > where I've sent some test messages from several different e-mail accounts.

[Mailman-Users] bizarre archiving problem

I've been having a problem with archiving that has me puzzled: One of my list's archives displays in each message's From header the user's address followed by his name in parentheses. Another of my list's archives displays the list address in the From field in place of the user's address, again

[Mailman-Users] address obscuring problem

For one of my lists, I have "show member addrs so they're not recognizable as email addrs" set to "no", and if I do a dump of that lists' db, I see that obscure_addresses = 0. But when I look at the archives, all of the >From headers show up like this: From: