On Jul 16, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Short version -- all good tips; many thanks. We're investigating them
> all, but as you suggested, we're changing one thing at a time.
> Checking them thoroughly takes a little while, so I probably won't be
> able to
digest_size_threshhold is small enough and this post (or this and its
> predecessors) large enough that this post triggered a digest.
Makes perfect sense -- thanks!
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} Post Doctoral Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana
Un
On Jul 16, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Short version -- all good tips; many thanks. We're investigating them
> all, but as you suggested, we're changing one thing at a time.
> Checking them thoroughly takes a little while, so I probably won't be
> able to
o in order to do all the same
> sorts of checks that they've always been doing.
We checked into that, and seem to have a pretty reliable DNS connection
(and its cached locally).
I don't think we're a victim of tarpit kinds of remote MTAs, but even
if we are, lowering the S
n,
> yes.
The thought occurs to me that perhaps it wasn't our sendmail guys who
changed something, but perhaps the guys in the anti-spam/virus-checking
crew changed something (I believe they also check outgoing mails for
some insundry list of things that they believe indicates spam/viruses
.org/
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/
> jsquyres%40osl.iu.edu
>
> Security Policy:
> http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&;
> file=faq01.027.htp
>
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} Post D
il, not how many mails it gives in each MTA transaction.
Any suggestions/comments would be appreciated.
Many thanks.
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} Post Doctoral Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana
University
