Re: [Mailman-Users] The "right" way to reply to a mailing list

2015-03-21 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Barry Warsaw" > On Mar 20, 2015, at 08:19 AM, Andrew Stuart wrote: > >When I reply to a message on a mailing list, what is the “right” way > >to do it? > >Should I be deleting previous thread text from my response? > >Should I be adding anything in? > > Of c

Re: [Mailman-Users] The "right" way to reply to a mailing list

2015-03-21 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Lindsay Haisley" > In many mail user agents, when you press the "Reply" button the program > will analyze the headers, determine that the post being replied to came > from a list and offer a "Reply to List" option in addition to a simple > reply, which genera

Re: [Mailman-Users] Emergency moderation of all list traffic is set to 'Yes'

2014-12-18 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Mark Sapiro" > On December 18, 2014 12:02:24 PM PST, "Xie, Wei" > wrote: > >We have one customer to set " Emergency moderation of all list > >traffic" to 'Yes', all posted messages are really held, but owners do not > >receive moderation notices. Is this nor

Re: [Mailman-Users] Digest indexes

2014-12-16 Thread Jay Ashworth
--- Original Message - > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Andrew Hodgson writes: > > > I run a high volume list (around 80 messages per day), and we have > > complaints from digest users that the digests are difficult to work > > with. One requested feature is could the digests be in HTML > > f

Re: [Mailman-Users] Post-subscription processing

2013-08-15 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Jim Popovitch" > The SDLU list is whitelist'ed from spamassassin processing, so a fair amout > of spam from non-members gets into the moderator queue. The goal is to > reject at the MTA where sender is not in a sender_access restriction > table (which will be

Re: [Mailman-Users] Post-subscription processing

2013-08-15 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Mark Sapiro" > On 08/15/2013 07:17 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > What's the sanest way to export a list of current subscribers > > everytime there is a new subscriber? I want to maintain a table of > > current list members (for postfix to reject if to:list !=

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-03 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Mark Sapiro" > On 06/03/2013 10:23 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > > > RFE: That mailman 3 permit users to specify that they subscribe with > > plus-hacked addresses (and optionally what delimiter character they > > use

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-03 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Bill Cole" > The original poster's difficulty was that MM did not see "user@domain" > as a valid confirmer of a subscription by "user+tag@domain" but it would > be profoundly wrong for MM to do so. Making MM recognize multiple tag > delimiters would multiply

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-03 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Tanstaafl" > > The use of '+' as a tag delimiter is widespread but it is not in any > > sense a "standard" and comes nowhere near universality. There is no > > way for a Mailman instance to know which domains make "user+tag" and > > "user" equivalent and whic

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-01 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Bill Cole" > It is altogether always wrong for ANY mail software outside of a domain > to parse the local part of an address in that domain except for a tiny > handful of standard special local parts (e.g. "postmaster"). The use of > '+' as a tag delimiter is

[Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-05-30 Thread Jay Ashworth
I just subscribed to the virtualgl-users list at SF, and I subscribed with a plushacked email address, jra+vgl@ Got the confirmation email ok, of course, but when I tried to send something, it bounced "because I'm not subscribed to the list". I've never had that happen before, but it's possible t