On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 19:27, Dan Mick wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote:
> > I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
> > this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
> > hot-buttons, like controlling the L
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote:
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue
Well, if mailman did List
Hi folks! I've been doing some poking around, trying to figure out some
more of the intricacies of nested-lists. According to the way that I'm
reading RFC 2369's section on "Supporting Nested Lists", whether or not
List-Post is re-written should be configurable.
My current configuration has a s
Hi folks! I've got mailman throwing up the "we've hit a bug page" on a
set of archives for me pretty consistently. The python traceback says
something about "OverflowError: integer multiplication" (I've included
the whole output below). It's showing up in gzip.py, but these archives
aren't espe
On 03 May 2001 10:54:26 -0700, alex wetmore wrote:
> On 3 May 2001, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > Hi there! I've got some semi-private distribution lists on an MS
> > Exchange server here at work, which I'd like to propogate off-site using
> > mailman. I can creat
Hi there! I've got some semi-private distribution lists on an MS
Exchange server here at work, which I'd like to propogate off-site using
mailman. I can create a mailing list, and add it to the list of people
on this distribution list very easily. What I'd like to do is make sure
that Joe User
I've been running mailman on my servers for a while, and letting other
people run the mailing lists, but just recently I ended up starting a
list which I need to run. I've seen this "administrivia" option quite a
few times, and thought "oh, that's cool, I don't have to worry about
silly people se
On 09 Feb 2001 20:25:28 +0530, Satya wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2001 at 06:39, Travis Llewellyn wrote:
>
> >One thing that some of you running Redhat 7.0 may want to look at when
> >compiling Mailman is setting CC to kgcc instead of gcc. When I compile
> >mailman with gcc that is included with Redhat 7.0
