I found it
easier to tune things with Postfix. If you'd like extra assistance in
getting your Sendmail install tuned properly for your list, do feel free
to drop me a note off-list and I'd be happy to help out.
--
Graham TerMarsch
Howling Frog Internet Development, Inc. http://www.
m a bit much.
How are other people grappling with the memory requirement issues?
--
Graham TerMarsch
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
be a job for Mailman 3.0.
Don't think that its disk access, but I could be wrong. Box has 512MB of
RAM, and with the volume of traffic we've got coming in to this machine
the Mailman database should be stuck in cache perpetually. I could be
totally
7;ve seen so far this appears to have fixed the major fire that I've had.
Now all I've got to figure out is how to try to speed up the admin CGIs so
that they don't take two or three minutes to load when dealing with large
lists...
Thanks again Barry,
--
Graham TerMarsch
---
es to
generate.
Isn't a high traffic list, though; only gets at most one posting a day.
Any suggestions on how to fine-tune the lockfile timeouts or other
internal Mailman settings to try to increase the performance of the admin
scripts?
--
Graham TerMarsch
-
cess the list that just can't get in (which isn't good).
Would it be correct to say that if the CGI process dies for some unforseen
reason (e.g. Apache kills it off because the user pressed the "stop"
button or the HTTP connection timed out), that the lock from
not, however, having any luck in finding information that
outlines how these values should be tuned for BIG lists.
I'm presuming that what I'm running into is more of a config/tuning issue
than a serious bug, as I'm sure I can't be the only person running lists
this
