Mark Sapiro msapiro.net> writes:
>
> On 04/23/2014 09:04 AM, Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We have one list where the moderator daily receives moderation requests for
> > the same 4 messages from 3 months ago. They have already been moderated
> > (discar
Hi,
We have one list where the moderator daily receives moderation requests for
the same 4 messages from 3 months ago. They have already been moderated
(discarded) months ago.
Is this a known issue? Is there a solution?
(mailman v 2.1.9)
thanks!
---
Hi,
Moderators of one of our lists would like to know what determines their mailman
webui login duration.
That is, they login once to approve a message, and after what time will the
webui require them to provide their credentials again for the next moderation
request?
I searched the docs, archi
Fletcher Cocquyt stanford.edu> writes:
>
> We receive this error:
>
> Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9
>
> We're sorry, we hit a bug!
>
I added a debug line to Archiver.py:
syslog('error', 'Archive file access failure:\n\t%s %s', old, new)
and it
We receive this error:
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback
and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but the webmaster
can find this information in the Mailman error logs.
Whe
python`PyRun_FileExFlags+0xaf
python`PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags+0x156
python`Py_Main+0xa6b
python`main+0x17
python`_start+0x80
-
On 7/2/08 1:54 PM, "Fletcher Cocquyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a
+0x80
0 42249 free:entry Ptr=0x86d78f0
On 7/2/08 10:14 AM, "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jul 2, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
>
>> I am hopeful our
0:33 0.35% python
On 7/2/08 9:01 AM, "Fletcher Cocquyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last night I added
> ulimit -v 5
>
> To the /etc/init.d/mailman script and restarted
>
> And I am seeing the processes stop growing at 49M - and so far no adverse
>
r to do this in
Runner._doperiodic().
On 7/2/08 9:22 AM, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
>
>> Or is there not a way expire & restart mailman processes analogous to the
>> apache httpd process expiration (designed to mi
:03 0.01% python
7558 mailman1 590 26M 24M sleep0:19 0.02% python
7572 mailman1 590 26M 23M sleep0:03 0.01% python
7567 mailman1 590 26M 23M sleep0:03 0.01% python
On 7/1/08 11:43 PM, "Fletcher Cocquyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On 7/2/08 8:15 AM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
>
>> I did a test - I disabled the SpamAssassin integration and watched the heap
>> grow steadily - I do not believe its SA related:
>
>
> OK.
>
> Does you
6 0 18m 4968 S0 127:02.62 0.9
> IncomingRunner:0:
> 1042 mailman9 18564 0 17m 7316 S0 11:34.14 0.9
> CommandRunner:0:1
> 1046 mailman 11 17276 0 15m 10m S1 66:32.16 0.8 VirginRunner:0:1
> 1044 mailman9 11568 0 9964 5184 S0 12:34.04 0.5 Ne
None of the lists seem too big:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:lists 8:24pm 73 # du -sk */*pck | sort -nr | head | awk
'{print $1}'
1392
1240
1152
1096
912
720
464
168
136
112
Researching python heap alloaction
thanks
On 7/1/08 6:14 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/1/08 3:37 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
>
>> Not finding a "leak" ref - save a irrelevant (for this runner issue) admindb
>
>
> Nothing has been done in Mailman to fix any memory leaks. As far a
s for 2.1.11 - can you please
>> provide a link?
>> (I want to see where it details any memory leak fixes since 2.1.9)
>> Fletcher Cocquyt
>> Senior Systems Administrator
>> Information Resources and Technology (IRT)
>> Stanford University School of Medicine
>
> Any other tips appreciated!
>
> I'd start by installing 2.1.11, which was just released yesterday.
>
> MB
--
Fletcher Cocquyt
Senior Systems Administrator
Information Resources and Technology (IRT)
Stanford University School of Medicine
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (
ilman1 590 27M 24M sleep0:16 0.01% python
10151 mailman1 590 9516K 3852K sleep0:05 0.01% python
10150 mailman1 590 9500K 3764K sleep0:00 0.00% python
On 6/23/08 8:55 PM, "Fletcher Cocquyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike, many th
ECTED]> wrote:
> Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
>
>> Hi, I am observing periods of qfiles/in backlogs in the 400-600 message
>> count range that take 1-2hours to clear with the standard Mailman 2.1.9 +
>> Spamassassin (the vette log shows these messages process in an avg of ~10
Hi, I am observing periods of qfiles/in backlogs in the 400-600 message
count range that take 1-2hours to clear with the standard Mailman 2.1.9 +
Spamassassin (the vette log shows these messages process in an avg of ~10
seconds each)
Is there an easy way to parallelize what looks like a single ser
massassin_or
g.pre
[22133] dbg: channel: metadata version = 611820
[22133] dbg: dns: 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org => 611820, parsed as 611820
[22133] dbg: channel: current version is 611820, new version is 611820,
skipping channel
[22133] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1
--
Fle
Yes, I had upgraded spamassassin, but not the spamd.py
After installing the latest version and bouncing its logging no more errors,
and the vette log has the spamassassin scores - looks good - thanks!
Fletcher
On 3/18/08 5:23 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fle
puts it second, but that should be good enough.
>What are the reason(s) why the messages are held?
>Did you restart Mailman after putting the above in mm_cfg.py?
On 3/18/08 3:17 PM, "Fletcher Cocquyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I am seeing the same issu
Hi, forgive me for replying directly I¹m on the digest version of the list
and saw your reply on the web archive
[Bounced to list - MS]
³Post by non-member to a members-only list² is the reason
If I grep the logs for a sample spam that is held instead of discarded, I
see:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:lo
> Hi, I am seeing the same issue from this thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg41720.html
>
> (spamassassin scores the email as spam (> DISCARD THRESHOLD), but mailman
> still holds it for moderation) and my moderators are asking ³don¹t we have
> spam filters?!²
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
