Re: [Mailman-Users] Cc: to cc: weirdness

2003-02-14 Thread Erik S.E. Walum
That worked! Thanks a lot for the help. Tokio Kikuchi uttered: > Hi, > > I think this patch will work. > >https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=685788&group_id=103&atid=300103 > > Cc-ing mailman-developers. > > Erik S.E. Walu

[Mailman-Users] Mail header weirdness, please respond.

2003-02-13 Thread Erik S.E. Walum
Since our upgrade to MM2.1, the Cc: field of messages sent to the list, if it has addresses in it, is altered to multiple cc: headers. For example, Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] when expanded and resent by mailman becomes, on seperate lines: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:

[Mailman-Users] Cc: to cc: weirdness

2003-02-10 Thread Erik S.E. Walum
We've recently upgraded to Mailman2.1 and have noticed that Mailman is now changing our Cc: headers and doing some RFC 2822 non-compliant business with them. The original header might be: Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] when the message comes through to the list, the h

[Mailman-Users] limiting max message size globally

2001-02-22 Thread Erik S.E. Walum
Is there a way to limit the max limit on message size globally for all lists? Were concerned about letting customers manage this veriable as it can have extremely detrimentel effects when your installation becomes quite large. Please respond to me personally as well as the list. Thanks. -- Erik

[Mailman-Users] Mailman not honoring list name case

2001-02-09 Thread Erik S.E. Walum
Is there a workaround for getting mailman to honor the case of a listname upon creation, we've noticed that it always capitalizes the first letter of a listname at creation time. Suggestions and comments welcome. thanks -esew -- Erik Walum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Internet Systems Engineer Verio I

[Mailman-Users] Virtual Domain Support

2001-02-09 Thread Erik S.E. Walum
We've been anticipating the fabled virtual domain support in mailman 2.0 for a long time, but alas, the only documentation on this appears to be a hack (ref: README.EXIM). IS there any further documentation on mailman 2.0's added support for virtualdomains, or was it simply a rewrite of the cronta