Our administration wants to use a mailman list for broadcast-only
official communications to students.
I've been asked to prevent the students from un-subscribing. Is there
a way to do that in any version of mailman? And/or any other
convenient mechanism? The list is a bit unwieldy for plain emai
I'm sorry , this one was our screwup.
An old test list was around with a name that was one letter off.
(It would be a nice touch if the 'vette' log showed which list the discarded
mail was sent to...)
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@
reject_these_nonmembers and discard_these_nonmembers are both empty (looking
at the web interface)
The discarded messages appear in vette, but not with the list name, just a
line like this:
Oct 23 14:31:42 2006 (6918) Message discarded, msgid: <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I changed the "should be forwar
I am running mailman 2.1.8 on Solaris 10 with sendmail.
I have an umbrella list which seems to be discarding messages from
non-members. With the settings below, I expected that the correct behavior
would be to hold the messages:
On the Privacy options:
Action to take for postings from non-
Oh nevermind, I am on crack. This wouldn't work.
You'd still have to use some intermediate filter to decide what was a reply
and what was an original.
On 9/27/06, Elizabeth Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would think you could make it work "outside the sy
I would think you could make it work "outside the system" by setting
reply-to-poster, then changing the alias for the list to go both to the list
processing command, and to a dummy-user . Then pipe the dummy user's mail
into something that is web-accessible. You could use another mailman list,
and
Thanks again for all your help. I checked in last night and mailman was hung
again, but this time I saw that the OutgoingRunner process was missing, and
there are errors in the error log:
Sep 23 08:10:17 2006 (2180) Master qrunner detected subprocess exit
(pid: 1592, sig: None, sts: 1, class: Outg
Sigh... OK, thank you all for the help. I think I understand now!
My theory: my **original** problem was a large HTML message gunking up the
out box. Having cleaned that out, it sounds like I then proceeded to trash
an afternoon's worth of messages by trying to flush the queue incorrectly.
Fortun
(and yep, all the qrunner processes are running and look OK, from here)
On 9/22/06, Elizabeth Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To follow up to my own post:
> I have rebooted twice and restarted twice
> I see no interesting error messages in any logs
> A few mess
files
subdirectories are all empty
On 9/22/06, Elizabeth Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm running mailman 2.1.8 on Solaris 10 (06/06)
>
> After working fine for a month, my mailman install broke this morning (I
> know something must have changed but I can't see
I'm running mailman 2.1.8 on Solaris 10 (06/06)
After working fine for a month, my mailman install broke this morning (I
know something must have changed but I can't see what!) Mail sent to lists
ends up in /usr/local/mailman/qfiles/out . If I run unshunt, nothing
changes. If I run unshunt /usr/
Thanks but I am still not getting this.
On 8/30/06, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 2:12 PM -0400 2006-08-30, Elizabeth Schwartz wrote:
>
> > I have been charged with creating two lists, each with a limited set of
> > people who are allowed to **post**
I've read the FAQ and followed the steps at " How to restrict the list so
only authorized persons can post:" at
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq03.011.htp
but it does not answer this question:
I have been charged with creating two lists, each with a limited set of
people
13 matches
Mail list logo
