Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project (was: Handling Munged From Addresses)

On 2/27/20 2:08 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: ... > What has this yielded? > > "Most of the most commonly used parts" of Twisted are now Python 3 > compatible. I hear this how upgrading any django installation from one python-3 version to another python-3 version usually goes. I.e. long-term, at thi

Re: [Mailman-Users] send_reminders frequency

On 1/29/20 12:23 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 1/29/20 7:43 AM, dmaziuk via Mailman-Users wrote: >> >> apologies if this is a faq and my google-fu's failing to find the >> answer: can I change send_reminders to e.g. yearly? > > > Mailman's cron/mailpasswds is run via cron. You can edit Mailman's >

Re: [Mailman-Users] IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied on config.pck in Fedora 30

On 7/25/19 2:30 PM, Robert Kudyba wrote: > Have you seen the suggestion to use Apache with suexec at > https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Apache+Suexec ? My first attempt was > unsuccessful FWIW I could never get suexec to work reliably. Repartition the drive properly (get rid of LVM), use ext4, mount wi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Why are mails not being sent to all users (mails seem to disappear)?

On 5/30/19 7:46 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Or that systemd prevented the emails from being sent in the first place, > and didn't log the fact that it had done so? I don't think systemd metastasized its own smtpd just yet, so it probably can't do that. Fear not, though, it has its own DNS resol

Re: [Mailman-Users] utf-8 error with all lists

On 5/13/19 10:19 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 5/13/19 7:46 AM, Jason Morrill wrote: >> >> It appears that lowercase does return an apparent properly lowercased string >> of letters. So, I'm uncertain why the hand-edited code would function >> differently. > > > This is what we were unable to so

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead

On 4/12/19 10:21 AM, Matthew Goebel wrote: > Won't redhat just apply/support fixes provided the software vendor? If > something comes up with python > how likely are they to build their own fix? https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting/ -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMa

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead

PS not that I disagree that the practical way out right now is to make a simple e.g. flask-based UI for MM3. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead

On 4/11/19 12:15 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Generally older Python 3 code will run on newer versions. The issues are > trying to run code developed for newer Python 3 versions on older versions. The problem is reliance on third-party libraries coupled with absence of usable package management syste

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead in 2020 what are people's plans with mailman2?

On 4/11/2019 3:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: ... If you want something that's never going to change, Python 2.7 is as good as anything else. Some orgs have "cybersecurity" with "vulnerability scanners". You may have to spend more time hiding your python version from them, then you'll sp

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead in 2020 what are people's plans with mailman2?

On 4/10/19 2:08 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > Or rust, or python3 (which might be the easiest). I'm not sufficiently > up on the python differences, but. it can't be -that- difficult. > (and aren't there tools to assist? some code claims to be both v2 and v3 > compatible) (gnat? that's really

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead in 2020 what are people's plans with mailman2?

On 4/10/19 12:49 PM, Sean McBride wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:38:34 -0500, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users said: > >> How much support for python 2 have you been getting until now, and why >> do you believe you will need it in the future? > > Fixes to security vulner

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead in 2020 what are people's plans with mailman2?

On 4/10/19 10:36 AM, Matthew Goebel wrote: > Hey, > > Now that all support for Python 2 is supposed to go away in 2020 are > people going to move off of mailman 2? How much support for python 2 have you been getting until now, and why do you believe you will need it in the future? -- Dimitri

Re: [Mailman-Users] FetchMail feed into Mailman

On 3/26/19 4:12 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote: > Sure, FetchMail can pull email from the ISP and inject it into the local > server.  But what advantage does that gain you?  Is said advantage worth > the complexity? Apparently lennartwware-infested linux distros no longer require MTA, p

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman on google comput engine

On 3/21/19 3:57 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote: > Fetchmail itself is plenty common.  I had no idea that it was as common > with Mailman.  209 hits on the link that Mark shared. I honestly don't remember the details but if I was passing mail to local MTA configured as my home MX, I don'

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman on google comput engine

On 3/21/19 1:56 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 3/21/19 11:29 AM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote: >> >> I see no technical reason why Mailman couldn't function via something >> like fetchmail from a POP3 mailbox and SMTP Authentication to send. ... >> It would be quite atypical.  But I think it s

Re: [Mailman-Users] mm-handler same as postfix-to-mailman.py

On 1/7/19 2:13 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote: > I think Sendmail (and other MTAs that I've tested) default to > user@host.domain too.  But that's just a default that's easy to change. LOL. Not on IRIX it wasn't. > Or are you saying that you used > MX records to route email to a differ

Re: [Mailman-Users] SOLVED scrub attachments

On 12/14/18 11:18 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > . Oh, so it's a feature. Colour me surprised. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -

Re: [Mailman-Users] SOLVED scrub attachments

So this was a user problem, mailman works exactly as advertised: - user has his e-mail forwarded to gmail, - gmail put it in "all mail", - not seeing it in "inbox", the user went and checked the archives, - where the attachments were scrubbed. Now that we found the actual e-mails, the attachments

Re: [Mailman-Users] scrub attachments

On 12/12/18 5:53 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > If you're asking if a non-digest member is set to 'plain' would > attachments be scrubbed from posts sent to that member, the answer is > no. the 'plain' setting affects only the digest format for digest > members. It has no effect for non-digest members.

Re: [Mailman-Users] scrub attachments

On 12/12/18 4:42 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Those settings allow non-plain text attachments to remain as attachments > in individual messages and MIME format digests sent to list members, but > they will always be 'scrubbed' from plain text digests and the pipermail > archive because those things on

[Mailman-Users] scrub attachments

Hi all, I've a user send a message with pdf attachments and they ended up as html links to the web archive. Which is fine except - content filtering is off, - scrub attachments is set to no. I though that was supposed to allow attachments through. I guess I thought wrong, but what am I missing? T

Re: [Mailman-Users] Translation (Localization) of mail addresses?

On 12/06/2018 11:24 AM, Lucio Chiappetti wrote: > As a native italian speaker (who however virtually always uses the > English interface in the *GUI* of mailman and any other tool) I would > regard as highly inconvenient any localization of *service address > suffixes*). Oh, I dunno. I think "поч

Re: [Mailman-Users] Some site blocking our emails from mailman 2.1.29 ?

On 11/30/2018 04:17 PM, Matthew Goebel wrote: > Hello, > > We've recently had one or two sites block email coming from one of our > lists. > They seem to indicate it is because of sending address having bounces in it? > ie... listname-boun...@list.emich.edu > This seems odd, and I'm trying to fi

Re: [Mailman-Users] members not receiving their own messages.

On 08/21/2018 06:06 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > I'm sorry not to be of more help, but I think it's likely that the > best we will offer are the digest option and the "ack" functionality > so that users will know the mailing list received the message. Or they could check out list archives and