Mark Sapiro a écrit :
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Well, I can't argue that in this instance free.fr does a better job of
detecting spam than the list, but a) free.fr does not provide mailing
lists beyond the most basic functionality, and b) I'm not in position to
suggest moving the list
Stephen J. Turnbull a écrit :
Albert ARIBAUD writes:
> But is there a way (besides patching and recompiling) to let mailman
> know that 5xx (and possibly 4xx as well) rejects which mention spam
> should not cause an increase of the bounce counter?
4xx should be handled at the
Hi all,
I am subscribed to a list managed by... mailman. :)
From time to time, spam makes it to the list and is thus distributed to
list members. When this happens and the spam is delivered to my provider
(free.fr), this provider rejects it by a "550 Spam detected" message --
which is fine be
