At 06:21 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>At 06:01 PM 5/21/02, you wrote:
>>At 05:45 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>>>That's it. If you would spend half the amount of time learning Python and
>>>HTML as you do complaining, you would have figured all of this out by now.
>>
>>I know HTML just
my college circa 1973 (they had one album out). Dozens of kegs and "cups"
>the size of large popcorn vats at the movies. People were passed out
>everywhere. It was a good time.
I doubt you were and if your idea of a good time is having everyone passed
out from being drunk that c
LOTS OF LUCK! I asked how to do this and only got rude answers that said
I am trying to force the software to do things it was not intended to
do. If you figure it out let me know. BTW the actual restricting of posts
to just you is the easy part. The numerous referneces to web pages,
post
At 04:17 PM 5/16/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>"AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin" wrote:
>>
>> At 12:35 AM 5/16/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>> >On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:25:53AM -0400, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin
>> >wrote:
>> >> Does not
At 12:35 AM 5/16/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:25:53AM -0400, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin
>wrote:
>> Does not work in a shared environment. PERMISSION DENIED every time!
>
>Uh?
>You gotta be part of the group mailman to have permissions
Two Issues with the LISTS command:
1) I am running in a shared environment. When I send LISTS to the
listname-request address I get a listing of all lists on the server and NOT
just the one(s) for that domain. My domain should not be allowed to
advertise other webmasters' lets. In fact I DO
>On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:04:52AM -0400, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin
>wrote:
>> What is the URL that I can go to pull a complete list of all my
>> subscribers and their password? I don't want any sort of nice cute warm
>> and fuzzy graphical glitze
What is the URL that I can go to pull a complete list of all my
subscribers and their password? I don't want any sort of nice cute warm
and fuzzy graphical glitzed up thing, just a quick and dirty complete
list. The list needs to be continuous, not paged. Any ideas?
They are not one sided conversations. The discussion was in reply to a
question that I asked on the list. IMHO it is proper to continue posting
to the list. In fact the undesired behavior is to take a list discussion
private. Questions that are asked that relate to the general topic of the
t;
>Mike
>
>---
>Michael Smith (Warlock on IRC)
>http://www.warlock.web.za/
>"The software said Windows95 or better...
>...so I got Linux"
>
>
>On Mon, 13 May 2002, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin wrote:
>
>> Well bully fo
With Majordomo there IS nothing to maintain! That was the point I was
trying to make. I do understand that it is a case of different strokes for
different folks. I have no problem with that what-so-ever. MM is not at
all designed for use as a news list. It may well work OK for a di
red anyway. You should have to enable it if you want
>> it. The whole purpose of closing a list is to not get crap mail that you
>> dont want. If I wanted to have to approve mail i would have set it up to
>> be moderated.
>>
>>
>>
>> At 10:05 AM 5/14/2002 +080
t;
>Lewis
>
>At 06:18 PM 5/13/02 -0400, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin wrote:
>>I have my list closed so that only subscribers can post. I keep getting
>>these emails each time a non-subscriber tries to post saying that I have
>>to go approve or reject the post. Hey g
that I get it.
At 05:00 PM 5/13/2002 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>"AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin" wrote:
>
>> Mail that you
>> dont see on the list does not get to the list. Same damn thing.
>>
>> As long as it is blocked from the list the
Now thats about the stupidest statement I have ever seen! Mail that you
dont see on the list does not get to the list. Same damn thing. What
people send is another issue. Folks can send what ever they want where
ever and when ever they want. As long as it is blocked from the list t
I have my list closed so that only subscribers can post. I keep getting
these emails each time a non-subscriber tries to post saying that I have to
go approve or reject the post. Hey guess what, I made it closed because I
DONT want these posts. Go figure! So tell me how do I make it stop
s
At 07:28 PM 5/11/2002 -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
>On Sat, 11 May 2002 21:36:11 -0400 `
>AerosmithFanClub com List Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well damn that sucks.
>
>Mailman is not for you at this point. I recommend finding another
>mailing list solution.
I have no choice in th
Well damn that sucks. This is one of the areas of this program that
whoever wrote it got just a little too anal. It is JUST a mailing
list. Heck I ran a list under Majordomo for 8 years w/o a single spam
coming across the list and no one getting unsubscribed without them doing
it th
A correctly configured list will get ZERO spam.
At 06:04 PM 5/9/2002 -0400, Chuck Peters wrote:
>
>I am sure many of you are spending some time moderating lists where most
>of the moderation is SPAM. A couple lists ar getting more spam than
>legitimate traffic and its a real pain to clean th
Thanks but this I don't need to go through all that junk just to make it so
a user does not need to remember a password. The software says a subscribe
request that includes a password will use that password for the user. All
I am asking (and asking again) is if there is a way to set up an ini
I have a few questions about MM. Lets start with the whole password thing.
First I like the software but it really is way over kill in the area of
complication. For example the whole idea of passwords for each user is
really (in many cases) totally unnecessary. My users don't want to have to
21 matches
Mail list logo
