Thanks, Richard and Mark, for responses.
Richard wrote:
I suspect that it isn't that the list added the name after the
>Re:, but that the MUA left it there and added the Re: first,
>and the list saw that the tag was already in the message and
>left it there. This keeps the subject tidy.
**I
While in the topic of replying, why does mailman put the
"Re:" before the [listname]? Or rather inserts the list
name after the Re: ? (For you send it out as "Re: The right way")
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] The "right" way to reply to a mailing
list
It likely is my odd taste, and perh
Hello,
I'm new here, so not sure if this is appropriate:
In regards to FAQ 3.27:
Am I the only one who would find it extremely helpful if duties
could be better split? Certainly for large lists. That is:
Owners = who can determine the list's configuration
Admins = who handle subscriptions and
