Re: [Mailman-Users] FW: -EXT-Re: Any scripting available for server site admin

2018-06-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 06/05/2018 04:54 PM, Parker, Michael D. wrote: > > Hmmm.I also note something interesting about find_member, it treats email > addresses with different character case-ing differently. > > Thus michael.d.par...@ga.com lists are put in a separate grouping from > michael.d.par...@ga.com lis

Re: [Mailman-Users] FW: -EXT-Re: Any scripting available for server site admin

2018-06-05 Thread Richard Damon
The user part of an email address MIGHT be case sensitive, so unless you KNOW that a given domain is case insensitive, changing the case of an email entails some risk. Mailman is just being appropriately cautious here. On 6/5/18 7:54 PM, Parker, Michael D. wrote: > Original Message- > From

[Mailman-Users] FW: -EXT-Re: Any scripting available for server site admin

2018-06-05 Thread Parker, Michael D.
Original Message- From: Parker, Michael D. Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 16:46 To: 'Mark Sapiro' Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] -EXT-Re: Any scripting available for server site admin Thanks Hmmm.I also note something interesting about find_member, it treats email addresses with di

Re: [Mailman-Users] -EXT-Re: Any scripting available for server site admin

2018-06-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 06/05/2018 03:55 PM, Parker, Michael D. wrote: > > Again I am wondering about commands that operate on a server basislike > list all members in all groups in one command... bin/find_member . The '.' is a pattern that matches any address. >.remove selected user from all lists in my ser

Re: [Mailman-Users] -EXT-Re: Any scripting available for server site admin

2018-06-05 Thread Parker, Michael D.
Hmmmthese commands operate on a list basis, not a system basis (i.e. global) as I had hoped for.. Again I am wondering about commands that operate on a server basislike list all members in all groups in one commandremove selected user from all lists in my server. The latter would

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.26: `make install` fails

2018-06-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 06/05/2018 01:40 PM, Brent Kearney wrote: > Thanks Mark; its an old Sun Solaris 10 system. I’m not sure how to get the > version from make itself, but the GCC version is 3.4.3. Try make --version or if that doesn't work, make --help to see the options. -- Mark Sapiro The highway

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.26: `make install` fails

2018-06-05 Thread Brent Kearney
Thanks Mark; its an old Sun Solaris 10 system. I’m not sure how to get the version from make itself, but the GCC version is 3.4.3. > On Jun 5, 2018, at 14:17, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 06/04/2018 05:31 PM, Brent Kearney wrote: >> Hello, >> >> When I run 'make install’ on mailman-2.1.26 (with

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.26: `make install` fails

2018-06-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 06/04/2018 05:31 PM, Brent Kearney wrote: > Hello, > > When I run 'make install’ on mailman-2.1.26 (with python 2.7), I get a fatal > error in the “misc” directory. The complete output is below. > > I notice that the "for p in ; \” has an empty list of packages. Perhaps > that for loop sho

[Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.26: `make install` fails

2018-06-05 Thread Brent Kearney
Hello, When I run 'make install’ on mailman-2.1.26 (with python 2.7), I get a fatal error in the “misc” directory. The complete output is below. I notice that the "for p in ; \” has an empty list of packages. Perhaps that for loop should be surrounded by a conditional checking that the $(PACK

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bogus Subscriptions (was: Mailman-Users Digest, Vol 172, Issue 6)

2018-06-05 Thread Adam Goldberg
Mark - did you consider generalizing the patch a little bit (so it works with Spamhaus, but also with other RBLs)? Spamhaus is one RBL provider, but there are a bunch (and most of them work the same way). -- Adam Goldberg 571-276-0305 -Original Message- From: Mailman-Users [mailto:mai