Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-to options not working

On 2/5/2018 12:29 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > The question I asked, which you misinterpreted completely IMO, and > Grant partially agreed with is "Does an algorithm which 1. gives > overriding precedence to Reply-To, 2. otherwise if List-Post is > present directs it there, and 3. finally falls

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message-ID required - was: Reply-to options not working

On 02/05/2018 11:55 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 02/05/2018 12:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> >> According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be >> present and MUST be unique. > > Do you have a reference for this? I thought this was correct, but I > recently looked it up in R

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message-ID required - was: Reply-to options not working

On 02/05/2018 12:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be > present and MUST be unique. Do you have a reference for this? I thought this was correct, but I recently looked it up in RFC 5322 and predecessors (see

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-to options not working

Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users writes: > Just because an MUA isn't on the Internet, does not mean that it > shouldn't play by the same or very similar rules. If it doesn't DWIM, I don't use it. But that's not the same as talking about conformance of clients. The question is whether the MUA *

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-to options not working

Jordan Brown writes: > If you have "smart reply" as a separate function, yes.  If you have > the typical "Reply" and "Reply All", and the mailing list software > sets "Reply-To: ", then replying to the author is awkward and > error-prone. Sure, but in this thread we all agree that Reply-To mu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-to options not working

Dimitri Maziuk writes: > Does it ave the same Message-ID though? According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be present and MUST be unique. The MUA or submission agent should add it before handing off to the MTA. As a last resort the MTA may add it. If it gets past the MTA wi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-to options not working

Dimitri Maziuk writes: > On 2018-01-29 23:51, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > ... [ Reply-To ] should have a checkbox "same as my > > From address." > > Oh, great, now I'll rreecceeiivvee eevveerryytthhiinngg > ttwwiiccee.. No, that's not the way Reply-To works. Anyway, the point is that