On 09/29/17 03:13, Jim Dory wrote:
> The
> spammers attacking us must not be very smart, though they are persistent.
The truth, I think, is that *most* spammers aren't very smart. The
smart ones have figured out that the real money isn't in spamming, it's
in selling spamming tools and spam hostin
On 09/29/2017 12:13 AM, Jim Dory wrote:
>
> I opened a trouble ticket to see if the host support had a solution to all
> the spam. They suggested setting the spam reject score in SpamAssassin for
> our VPS server at 3.5. When I had it set earlier at 5, it started marking
> member's posts as spam
Sorry, I've been ignoring Mailman for a few days, and I guess you've
got a solution that works already. This is a pair of alternatives
that each have some advantages and disadvantages compared to your
regexp-based solution. FWIW, YMMV
Jim Dory writes:
> Apparently our host provider performs sp
Thanks for the reply Stephen,
I opened a trouble ticket to see if the host support had a solution to all
the spam. They suggested setting the spam reject score in SpamAssassin for
our VPS server at 3.5. When I had it set earlier at 5, it started marking
member's posts as spam and rejected them. D
