Re: [Mailman-Users] Allow discard-and-forward for spam filters?

On 3/30/16 5:42 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > You can always submit a request for MM 2.1 at <>. Sorry, I neglected to fill in the URL. It is . -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense

Re: [Mailman-Users] Allow discard-and-forward for spam filters?

On 3/30/16 5:49 AM, Adrian Pepper wrote: > > However, in > https://python.org/mailman/admin/mailman-users/privacy/spam > you can only Dicard or Hold. > (Complete list Defer, Hold, Reject, Discard, Accept). > > It would be nice if for each filter rule individually you > could choose "discard and f

Re: [Mailman-Users] header field: Sender

On 3/30/16 12:46 AM, willi uebelherr wrote: > > But the answer to the first question is not correct. I have some people > in different mailman maillists with 2 Sender fields. And because my mail > client Thunderbird use the first then the filter don´t work. I had to > extend the filterlist with th

[Mailman-Users] Allow discard-and-forward for spam filters?

Hello, Because of centralized administration of mailman server used by many campus units, and other general inertia, we still use 2.1.12 (a couple of local mods; I know of one for sure for recognizing alternative email addresses). So I am wondering if later versions of Mailman 2 have added someth

Re: [Mailman-Users] header field: Sender

Dear Mark and Stephan and friends, yes, i absolutly trust you that you work in relation to the RFC´s definition. And, it is truth, that i am not an expert in the email transport mechanism. My second question was more to understand the background. And i am very thankful for the answer from M