On 01/21/2016 10:15 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> Here's what I think is happening.
>
> Mailman is munging the From: header from
>
> From: vale...@mydomain.org
>
> to
>
> From: valérie via List
>
> where valérie comes from the member's name field in the list membership.
> This is done to try to
On 01/21/2016 11:08 AM, gabriel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:50:55AM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> I said "I'm still interested in seeing the unmunged, raw headers from
>> the message delivered by Mailman" I.e., the message FROM Mailman, not
>> the message TO Mailman.
>
> I don't quite un
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:50:55AM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 10:40 AM, gabriel wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:15:33AM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >>
> >> So there are no archives from which to retrieve what I asked for. I'm
> >> still interested in seeing the unmunged, raw he
On 01/21/2016 10:40 AM, gabriel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:15:33AM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> So there are no archives from which to retrieve what I asked for. I'm
>> still interested in seeing the unmunged, raw headers from the message
>> delivered by Mailman, but I'm sure I know wha
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:15:33AM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> So there are no archives from which to retrieve what I asked for. I'm
> still interested in seeing the unmunged, raw headers from the message
> delivered by Mailman, but I'm sure I know what's happening.
i'm sorry there's really no
On 01/21/2016 09:02 AM, Leo Francisco wrote:
> Thanks for the info, I will look into what version the group are
> running. So it isn't really simple essentially?
I suspect that an existing list is Mailman 2.1. Mailman 3 is still
pretty new.
The theming itself is not too difficult depending on wh
On 01/21/2016 09:27 AM, gabriel wrote:
>
> That may not be so easy. in fact there is no archive of that list, but haven't
> archived messages not been processed by mailman?
OK. I sent my last reply before I saw this.
So there are no archives from which to retrieve what I asked for. I'm
still in
On 01/21/2016 08:06 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> gabriel writes:
>
> > so the message of users getting bounced look like (abbreviated):
>
> > This is a delivery status notification from some.server.org,
> > running the Courier mail server, version 0.75.0.
>
> FYI, bounce messages may or m
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:06:29AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> > From: =?utf-8?q?Val=C3=A9rie/Something_via_mylist_=3Cmyli?=,
> > =?utf-8?b?ZW5AbGlzdHMubXRtZWRpYS5vcmc+?=
>
> > Sender: "mylist"
>
> So this has already been through Mailman. We really really need to
> see the
Thanks for the info, I will look into what version the group are
running. So it isn't really simple essentially?
On 21/01/16 01:35, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 02:16 PM, Leo Francisco wrote:
>> I was just wondering how easy it is to theme Mailman? I haven’t access
>> to an installation tha
gabriel writes:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:44:26AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >
> > Absent a bug in the email package. But yes, I'm suggesting exactly
> > that there's a broken MUA out there sending something that doesn't
> > parse correctly, and the email package is failing to re
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:44:26AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> Absent a bug in the email package. But yes, I'm suggesting exactly
> that there's a broken MUA out there sending something that doesn't
> parse correctly, and the email package is failing to respect the "In
> the face of amb
12 matches
Mail list logo
