Re: [Mailman-Users] old messages sent to list on reboot

On 08/29/2015 11:01 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > > I started reboot on 27 August at 16:14; > # zcat qrunner.3.gz > Aug 27 16:15:25 2015 (3092) CommandRunner qrunner started. > Aug 27 16:15:25 2015 (3094) NewsRunner qrunner started. > Aug 27 16:15:25 2015 (3090) ArchRunner qrunner started. > Aug 27 16:

Re: [Mailman-Users] old messages sent to list on reboot

Thank Mark Mark Sapiro wrote on Sun-30-Aug 15 3:54AM > On 08/27/2015 10:53 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > There was a bug in Mailman 2.1.9 that would not unlink the > qfiles/QUEUE/*.bak files used for recovery processing under some > conditions. These files would then be 'recovered' when Mailman is res

Re: [Mailman-Users] How to prevent messages from being "held"

On 08/28/2015 12:42 PM, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: >> >> Please tell us what mailman says about them being held- are they >> over-size, implicit destinations, from a non-subscriber on a closed >> list, etc? There's usually a reason, although it's not always clear >> what that reason is. > It's always

Re: [Mailman-Users] importing archived Maildir email lists into Mailman lists archives

On 08/28/2015 12:52 AM, [IDIS Technical Secretariat] Ricardo Rodríguez wrote: > > I have a number of Maildir format mailing lists archives and I would like > to add them to the archives of the same lists created in a new Mailman > installation. This search

Re: [Mailman-Users] Error updating mailman Ubuntu 14.04.3

On 08/25/2015 04:28 PM, billy noah wrote: > Tried running an update today and received this message: > > Setting up mailman (1:2.1.16-2ubuntu0.1) ... ... > Downgrade detected, from version 0x20112f1 to version 0x20110f0 I'm with Steve on this. This is very wierd. The first message says you are s

Re: [Mailman-Users] old messages sent to list on reboot

On 08/27/2015 10:53 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > Hi > > After rebooting my server, several mails from some weeks ago were > resent to lists and also a bunch of moderator requests to me. There was a bug in Mailman 2.1.9 that would not unlink the qfiles/QUEUE/*.bak files used for recovery processing un

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Bloat

On 08/27/2015 11:23 AM, Laura Creighton wrote: > You may be interested in this thread: > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2012-April/073181.html Thank you Laura. Also note that if sending users add a standard signature (prefixed with a '-- ' line), and repliers use an MUA that doe

Re: [Mailman-Users] ISO RegExp example to block bot subscribe requests

On 08/27/2015 08:32 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Woody Mon via Mailman-Users writes: > > > So I tried entering RegExp ^.*+ but Mailman rejected this entry. > > That's illegal syntax for a regexp because "+" is an operator. > > The version you want is "^.*\+". However, that is a very bad id

Re: [Mailman-Users] Does Mailman alter messages attached to moderation notification emails?

On 08/27/2015 06:22 PM, Peter Shute wrote: > > Now it's happened again, this time in a plain text only message. The period > is there in his copy of the sent message, missing in what went to the list. I > can also see that it's missing in the copy of the message attached to the > moderation not

Re: [Mailman-Users] ISO speciific RegExp to filter/discard bot subscribe requests

On 08/27/2015 02:49 AM, Nelson Kelly wrote: > > Common to ALL of the bot subscribe requests is including within the the > email address a "+" symbol. > > So I tried entering RegExp ^.*+ but Mailman rejected this entry. Because '+' means 1 or more of the preceding, but the preceding is a repeat

Re: [Mailman-Users] Assistance with altering reply-to behaviours and DMARC

On 08/27/2015 01:58 AM, Mark wrote: > Hi, > > First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number of > mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This version > was updated in July as follows: > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1417.html and included fixes f

Re: [Mailman-Users] list subscription spammers

On 08/26/2015 07:14 PM, Will Yardley wrote: > > % cat set_banlist.py ... Also see . -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

Re: [Mailman-Users] list subscription spammers

On 08/25/2015 10:12 AM, Will Yardley wrote: > I'm seeing massive numbers of subscription lists to various lists we > host (including multiple requests to the same list). > > These are submitted via a distributed network of hosts, presumably > botnet victims / open proxies. > > The requests are fr

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pluggable authentication for Mailman web interface?

On 08/26/2015 01:08 PM, Waldbieser, Carl wrote: > > Are there any guidelines for adding authentication and /or authorization > mechanisms to the Mailman web user interface? > Specifically, I was wondering if there is any kind of guidance for > authenticating the user via an HTTP header (e.g. HTT

Re: [Mailman-Users] {Disarmed} Re: Archive page not showing dates properly

On 08/24/2015 11:35 PM, Peter Wetz wrote: > > hm, I get this error though: > ... > File "/var/lib/mailman/Mailman/Archiver/HyperArch.py", line 1072, in > write_index_entry > 'date': time.strftime("%d %b %Y %H:%M:%S", time.localtime(article.date)), > TypeError: a float is required > > "a float i

[Mailman-Users] importing archived Maildir email lists into Mailman lists archives

Hi everybody! I'm new to most of the fields related with this issue so, please, accept my apologies in advance if the question or the way towards its answer is too obvious! I have a number of Maildir format mailing lists archives and I would like to add them to the archives of the same lists crea

Re: [Mailman-Users] Assistance with altering reply-to behaviours and DMARC

Sorry, serious finger fumble there. Please ignore the messed up one. Andrew Hodgson writes: > That is interesting, and I wonder if this is something to do with > the way that Redhat have implemented the new feature. My guess is that Red Hat backported 2.1.17 or 2.1.18-1. After getting compla

Re: [Mailman-Users] Assistance with altering reply-to behaviours and DMARC

Mark writes: > Is there any other code in the standard mailman where the reply-to > is populated with the original sender? I realise fully aware that > the version of mailman I have here isn't supported, or released, > and other bugs may have been introduced. In standard Mailman >= 2.1.18-1

Re: [Mailman-Users] Assistance with altering reply-to behaviours and DMARC

Will Yardley writes: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > Stock Mailman 2.1.12 doesn't do any DMARC detection. This is quite > > bizarre that they would backport such a feature rather than update to > > 2.1.18-1 or later. Mailman 2.1 is hardly an unstabl