Quoting Mark Sapiro :
On 03/24/2015 11:24 PM, David Benfell wrote:
Unfortunately, there appear to be some
boobytraps with Postfix's virtual_alias_maps that are forcing me to set
this aside for now. My existing set-up hadn't been using them; trying to
introduce them created some temporary failu
On 03/25/2015 03:46 AM, Danijel Domazet wrote:
> Thanks Mark,
>
> I tried to patch it with:
> self.respond = False
> but that didn't work.
Where did you put that line?
> Then I also tried to add immediate return from send_response, like so:
>
> def send_response(self):
> return
>
On 03/24/2015 11:24 PM, David Benfell wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, there appear to be some
> boobytraps with Postfix's virtual_alias_maps that are forcing me to set
> this aside for now. My existing set-up hadn't been using them; trying to
> introduce them created some temporary failures and probably
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 08:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 3/24/2015 10:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > What Outlook, Hotmail etc. call "Rich Text" is in fact HTML, not to be
> > confused with Microsoft's interchange Rich Text Format, RTF.
>
> And Outlook's 'HTML' is badly broken due to its reli
On 3/24/2015 10:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> What Outlook, Hotmail etc. call "Rich Text" is in fact HTML, not to be
> confused with Microsoft's interchange Rich Text Format, RTF.
And Outlook's 'HTML' is badly broken due to its reliance on the Word
HTML rendering engine.
Why MS decided to cha
At Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:42:23 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
>
> Peter Shute writes:
>
> > I've seen a plain text section that didn't match the html version
> > (if I'm remembering that incident correctly).
>
> Indeed, occasionally you'll see the arrogant "your MUA doesn't deal
> with MI
In a message of Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:34:32 +1100, Peter Shute writes:
>Thanks for that bit of reply style history! I've only been using
>email since quoting became a common feature, so I never saw this
>before and after effect. Have you seen a reduction in this "dressing
>down" style of reply since
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:31:08PM +1100, Peter Shute wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > > The default for MS Outlook seems to be HTML rather than Rich Text.
> >
> > What Outlook, Hotmail etc. call "Rich Text" is in fact HTML,
> > not to be confused with Microsoft's interchange Rich Text Format,
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Peter Shute wrote:
Have you ever been in the situation where you're waiting ...
Many of us deal with this by creating a message rule that filters the
unimportant list mail to a folder to be read at leisure.
I have procmail rules which filter particular e-mails to partic
