On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 11:52 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 3/20/2015 2:48 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 14:37 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >> No, the point is you apparently can't simply acknowledge that you
> >> mis-spoke/made a mistake.
> >
> > Tanstaafl, it it will make you h
On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 11:32 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 3/20/2015 8:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > Thunderbird isn't quite like that, but when I reply to a message from
> > the list I am given 3 options:
> >
> > Reply
> > Reply All
> > Reply to List
>
> Do you mean that you see a single butto
On 3/20/2015 2:48 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 14:37 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> No, the point is you apparently can't simply acknowledge that you
>> mis-spoke/made a mistake.
>
> Tanstaafl, it it will make you happy, I _officially_ acknowledge that I
> made a mistake/mis-spo
On 3/21/2015 12:55 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> If I were writing an MUA, I'd make each addressee a button which
> replies to them only.[1] For the explicit reply button, I'd
> automatically put the list-post and author in To:, provide an obvious
> delete button on each (as Gmail does), and pr
On 3/20/2015 8:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> Thunderbird isn't quite like that, but when I reply to a message from
> the list I am given 3 options:
>
> Reply
> Reply All
> Reply to List
Do you mean that you see a single button with a drop-down that provides
these three choices?
If so, then you
> On Mar 21, 2015, at 10:40 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Lindsay Haisley"
>
>> In many mail user agents, when you press the "Reply" button the program
>> will analyze the headers, determine that the post being replied to came
>> from a list and offer a "Re
On Don, 2015-03-19 at 17:45 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
[...]
also +1 for the "quote only relevant and answer inline directly below
it" style - an email is written once and read (hopefully;-) more often
so it is actually extremely unfriendly (because time killing) to all
others to make a mail not as
On Saturday 21 March 2015, Larry Kuenning wrote:
> Settable by which user? The sender or the recipient?
Recipient of course, sender has no way of knowing what the recipient prefers.
> And wouldn't a default of removing all but one level of quoted text make
> nonsense of some posts? E.g. in the
