Re: [Mailman-Users] Diagnosing command failures

2015-01-22 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Gary Merrill writes: > I know the kinds of problems you guys are facing -- although you > should be somewhat grateful that you aren't dealing with the FDA, > insurance companies, gigantic healthcare organizations, the CDC, > and multiple pharma companies. :-) I don't have to deal with them, b

Re: [Mailman-Users] Diagnosing command failures

2015-01-22 Thread Barry S. Finkel
On 1/22/2015 10:10 AM, Gary Merrill wrote: > Again, thanks to all of you for your responses. There are a number of thorny issues in attempting to "fix" (or at least address) what is "wrong" here. The original conceptual model of something like Mailman isn't quite right for the situation being

Re: [Mailman-Users] Digest Volume Frequency

2015-01-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 01/22/2015 08:17 AM, Peter Knowles wrote: > Hi, > > When I set the "Digest Volume Frequency" to "Weekly" is there a way set the > day which messages are sent out (Sun, Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat)? "Digest Volume Frequency" has nothing to do with when digests are sent. It only controls how o

[Mailman-Users] Digest Volume Frequency

2015-01-22 Thread Peter Knowles
Hi, When I set the "Digest Volume Frequency" to "Weekly" is there a way set the day which messages are sent out (Sun, Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat)? I'm currently using Mailman 2.1.18-1 Best Regards, Peter Knowles TPN Solutions Email: pknow...@tpnsolutions.com Phone: 604-782-9342 Skype: tpnsupp

Re: [Mailman-Users] Diagnosing command failures

2015-01-22 Thread Gary Merrill
Again, thanks to all of you for your responses. There are a number of thorny issues in attempting to "fix" (or at least address) what is "wrong" here. The original conceptual model of something like Mailman isn't quite right for the situation being faced today in the types of capabilities and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Diagnosing command failures

2015-01-22 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Peter Shute writes: > A lot of people use the cPanel version and can't do anything > complicated for support. Even though this particular case is about > trying to help a difficult user to do something that's normally > straightforward that's probably pointless anyway, I hope v3 at > least gi