John Levine writes:
> Have you tried any sort of reversible rewriting? On my lists, sending
> addresses in dmarc'ed domains get a local domain appended on the From:
> line, e.g. mail From: mari...@yahoo.com ->
> mari...@yahoo.com.dmarc.fail.
[...]
> It's gross and disgusting, but no worse t
># 1) as long as the list is not anonymous, the original From: address
>#should be obviously exposed, i.e. not just in a header that MUAs
>#don't display.
Have you tried any sort of reversible rewriting? On my lists, sending
addresses in dmarc'ed domains get a local domain appended on the
On 01/18/2015 03:14 PM, Clare Redstone wrote:
>
> I've been trying to understand from_is_list, anonymous_list,
> first_strip_reply_to, reply_goes_to_list and reply_to_address and don't know
> if I need to change options here or dmarc_moderation_action or both.
It's very tricky, and 2.1.19 will g
Apologies if this has been discussed before. I've read some of the archive
measures about DMARC but there are lots and there's so much technical stuff
in them that I don't understand. I don't understand what settings I need for
our email discussion group to work as smoothly as can be since DMARC ca
