On 10/16/2014 02:25 PM, Tapia, Rene wrote:
>
> I am new to the Mailman application, but was tasked to migrate the
> application (data) to a new server. I completed the task and am now running
> Mailman version 2.14. Everything seems to be working fine, except for one
> LIST. I thought it was du
Good Afternoon,
I am new to the Mailman application, but was tasked to migrate the application
(data) to a new server. I completed the task and am now running Mailman version
2.14. Everything seems to be working fine, except for one LIST. I thought it
was due to the migration, but the user repo
Dennis Carr writes:
> Long and short, ranting aside, how do I set up mailman so I don't get
> an email for each of the held messages, instead getting that sort of
> "digest" message? I've combed through the web ui, but I can't seem to
> find a relevant feature
In 2.1.18-1 on the "General
I have two lists - ffml and ffml-admins - which I've noticed a slight
behavior difference. On ffml-admins, I get a message once per day that
tells me that I have n>0 emails pending, and no emails on a per-email
received basis. With ffml, however, every time a pending message is
held, the moderato
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Marino Pascal wrote:
I know how to add addresses with the "accept_these_nonmembers Option"
That's the way I sort-of-regularly use.
We have mailing lists inside our nationwide organization (inaf.it), where,
for historical reasons, each of our 22 institutes may have 2-3 di
