Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman sending to existing subscribers but new subscribe doesn't work

On 09/02/2014 01:28 PM, David Whited-Ford wrote: > > We recently moved our list to a new server. Same domain name. > > Emails to the list work fine for existing subscribers but we can't add new > subscribers. > The mass subscription seems to work and the new users appear in the list but > don't

[Mailman-Users] mailman sending to existing subscribers but new subscribe doesn't work

Hello, We recently moved our list to a new server. Same domain name. Emails to the list work fine for existing subscribers but we can't add new subscribers. The mass subscription seems to work and the new users appear in the list but don't receive email, even though they receive the welcome ema

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderation by email instead of web interface ?

On 08/26/2014 01:43 AM, BONNET, Frank wrote: > > Anyone could send me some info on how to configure a particuliar list > to be moderated through email and NOT with the web interface with > the Approve mechanism Set General Options -> admin_immed_notify to Yes in the list's web admin interface. T

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderated list, letting some users be unmoderated, and with emails addressed to multiple recipients.

On 08/25/2014 12:12 PM, Steve wrote: > > I'm a moderator on a GNU Mailman list running version 2.1.13. > > > The list moderated, all posts come to me for approval. > > I have a few very trustworthy and regular posters that I have set as > unmodera

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderator Passwords

David Andrews writes: > I apologize for taking everybody's time. Apology graciously accepted, but really, none needed. Password management is at best annoying, and to do it *really* well, hard. Mailman is a complex product. I'm glad that the assurance that it shouldn't be *that* hard was enoug

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderator Passwords

At 08:37 PM 9/1/2014, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: David Andrews writes: > Then it never seems to work for them -- I end up changing password > several times until it eventually seems to take. It's not a matter of "taking". If you type the same password twice, and get a page saying password is

[Mailman-Users] List suddenly stopped adding footers.

Kevin T. Likes writes: > I have a user-managed list that suddenly stopped adding the footer > to messages. It appears that after the time footers stopped being > added, I started seeing links for scrubbed attachments to messages. The footer is set in the "Non-digest Settings" screen. It's the

Re: [Mailman-Users] .psv files in /var/spool/mailman/in 2.1.9

On 08/19/2014 02:27 PM, Will Yardley wrote: > I found some .psv files in /var/spool/mailman/in/ (RHEL 5 Mailman > package; 2.1.9). That seems to be too early for the stuff mentioned here > (and I don't see those options in Defaults.py) > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2009-June/066

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman is being a processor sponge.... very slow delivery...

Thanks So much Stephen, I just wanted make sure I got this in writing. And document what I had to do to fix the loop you found (more savy folks may have done it faster) I tried to use a text editor, but of course it did not (could not lock the file) Tried to create the change_owner script and use

[Mailman-Users] List suddenly stopped adding footers.

I have a user-managed list that suddenly stopped adding the footer to messages. It appears that after the time footers stopped being added, I started seeing links for scrubbed attachments to messages. What setting(s) could be causing this? -- Mai

[Mailman-Users] Message of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize

Fabio Eckhardt writes: > ​Is there any easy way to get Mailman messages of large size, only the > "owner" of the list may authorize? And only the smallest message > "moderator" can approve them? > > I'm really getting tired of dealing with those very large messages that > are released by

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize

At Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:32:04 -0300 Fabio Eckhardt wrote: > > ​Is there any easy way to get Mailman messages of large size, only the > "owner" of the list may authorize? And only the smallest message > "moderator" can approve them? > > I'm really getting tired of dealing with those very larg

[Mailman-Users] Message of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize

​Is there any easy way to get Mailman messages of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize? And only the smallest message "moderator" can approve them? I'm really getting tired of dealing with those very large messages that are released by the moderator.​ -- Fábio --