We've recently enabled munging with 2.1.18-1. I think it's already been
documented that this causes problems for iOS Mail users where they can no
longer see who originally sent the messages. I've discovered that there's a bit
more to it than that, at least in iOS 7.1.2, so I'm posting this in ca
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > If we set from_is_list to No, how does the list behave
> when > yahoo.com emails arrive?
>
> That depends on the setting of dmarc_moderation_action. If
> it is set to Accept, it just passes them through, and lets
> the destination decide what to do. Almost ce
Will Yardley writes:
> I think munging the headers is a sensible practice, as it makes it
> a little harder to listwash; the main idea of the FBL as I understand it
> is to give you an idea when there's some kind of gross abuse,
That's what they say, but in many cases that's not what they do.
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 18:22 +, John Levine wrote:
> >I think munging the headers is a sensible practice, as it makes it
> >a little harder to listwash; the main idea of the FBL as I understand it
> >is to give you an idea when there's some kind of gross abuse, not that
> >you are required to un
>I think munging the headers is a sensible practice, as it makes it
>a little harder to listwash; the main idea of the FBL as I understand it
>is to give you an idea when there's some kind of gross abuse, not that
>you are required to unsubscribe anyone who complains about your mail.
Munging FBLs
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 04:55:52PM -0700, Peter Knowles wrote:
> What is the best way to deal with feedback loop messages where the provider
> has redacted the email address of the party who filed the complaint?
I haven't looked at a FBL message for a while, but most of the ones I've
seen didn't
Lindsay Haisley writes:
> If you grok MM internals a bit and understand withlist and python, and
> don't mind importing the Python Crypto library I can send you the
> information on this hack, but I'd rather turn it over to the MM people
> for some sort of public posting so everyone can have a
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 12:33 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Peter Knowles writes:
>
> > What is the best way to deal with feedback loop messages where the
> > provider has redacted the email address of the party who filed the
> > complaint?
>
> What do you want to do with this information?
