On 06/21/2014 08:43 PM, Peter Fraser wrote:
> And what did that log show for the sender non-delivery notification
> message generated as a result of the undeliverable message.
> I looked at the postfix logs again and although I do see different type of
> bounces, I am not seeing anything delivere
And what did that log show for the sender non-delivery notification
message generated as a result of the undeliverable message.
I looked at the postfix logs again and although I do see different type of
bounces, I am not seeing anything delivered to mailman. Here are some examples:
Jun 20 04:11:3
Yahoo Groups also add something like this in a footer:
"Posted by: a real name a-n...@a-domain.co.uk"
and a series of mailto links below that for replying to the original sender or
to the group.
I find the former useful for telling who sent the message, because my iPad only
displays the list add
On 06/21/2014 07:23 PM, Peter Fraser wrote:
>
>
> Wait a minute, I typed this command by force of habit, just realized that's
> not what you told me to type so I ran it again
> ps -ax | grep BounceRunner
> and the result is:
> 8138 ?? S 0:00.26 /usr/local/bin/python2.7
> /usr/local/ma
Wait a minute, I typed this command by force of habit, just realized that's not
what you told me to type so I ran it again
ps -ax | grep BounceRunner
and the result is:
8138 ?? S 0:00.26 /usr/local/bin/python2.7
/usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner --runner=BounceRunner:0:1 -s
Ok so ps -waux | grep BounceRunner returns nothing. How do I start it up?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: htt
On 22/06/2014 00:04, Ron Guerin wrote:
> I'm struggling to find a palatable solution to the configuration of a
> list, and the new Yahoo-style DMARC problem.
>
> The list has mung on, as well as Reply-To: set to the list. The end
> result is nowhere does the original sender's address appear in th
Ron Guerin writes:
> Jane Doe (j...@example.com) via listname
>
> My question now is, is there any reason why re-writing it this way
> would be a bad idea?
First, the DMARC proponents themselves say "don't do that!" (Mostly
for the reasons given below.)
Second, it disrespects the wis
On 06/21/2014 04:04 PM, Ron Guerin wrote:
> I'm struggling to find a palatable solution to the configuration of a
> list, and the new Yahoo-style DMARC problem.
>
> The list has mung on, as well as Reply-To: set to the list. The end
> result is nowhere does the original sender's address appear in
>I was wondering about asking someone to make a Mailman handler that
>would re-write the From: address after munging to:
>
>From: Jane Doe (j...@example.com) via listname
>
>My question now is, is there any reason why re-writing it this way would
>be a bad idea?
Well, of course, it's a bad idea f
Peter Fraser writes:
> The message I showed earlier was the postfix on the same box as
> mailman. Mailman should detect those bounces. I was just thinking
> based on what you said about some smtp servers getting the 5xx
> status from downstream servers thatthose errors would not reach
> mail
On 06/21/2014 01:24 PM, Peter Fraser wrote:
>
>
> The message I showed earlier was the postfix on the same box as mailman.
> Mailman should detect those bounces.
And what did that log show for the sender non-delivery notification
message generated as a result of the undeliverable message.
And
willi uebelherr writes:
> I think, Goggle use the mail-message-id. Is it possible in the mailman,
> to change the message-id of the mail?
You don't want to do that. Modern mail clients determine
relationships ("order of conversations") among messages which may have
similar subjects (or may no
I'm struggling to find a palatable solution to the configuration of a
list, and the new Yahoo-style DMARC problem.
The list has mung on, as well as Reply-To: set to the list. The end
result is nowhere does the original sender's address appear in the
messages, when having them readily visible is t
The message I showed earlier was the postfix on the same box as mailman.
Mailman should detect those bounces.
I was just thinking based on what you said about some smtp servers getting the
5xx status from downstream servers thatthose errors would not reach mailman the
way things are set up her
On 06/21/2014 11:00 AM, Peter Fraser wrote:
> I checked the data directory and saw some *.pck files Their names were along
> the lines of "heldmsg--727.pck"so I guess then bouncerunner should
> be running. All the .pck files have heldmsg in the name.
These are all messages held waiting moderato
I checked the data directory and saw some *.pck files Their names were along
the lines of "heldmsg--727.pck"so I guess then bouncerunner should
be running. All the .pck files have heldmsg in the name.
The way our setup is designed though, the mailman box isn't the mail smtp
relay. It sits behin
Dear Mark,
many thanks. Now i understand. If i use the archive to import mails from
Mbox-format, the header are cutted. I don't like this. Maybe, with the
digest mode it is the same. And for my needs to be able to actually
interaction it is not good for me.
I will try to ask the google-team
On 06/21/2014 09:54 AM, willi uebelherr wrote:
>
> I think, Goggle use the mail-message-id. Is it possible in the mailman,
> to change the message-id of the mail?
A list member cannot control this.
The site admins could patch Mailman to do this, but it is not compliant
with mail standards and c
On 06/21/2014 10:05 AM, willi uebelherr wrote:
>
> many thanks for your answer. What is "digests"? I am a german and i
> don't understand the translation for "digest".
>From the subscription form on the listinfo page:
Möchten Sie die Listenmails gebündelt in Form einer täglichen
Zusammenfassung
Am 06/21/2014 11:05 a.m., schrieb Richard Damon:
> ...
> There are cases where YOUR mail transport or user agent might
> eliminate/hide messages. GMail is well know to do this, it will
> automatically remove extra copies of messages that it sees as
> dupicate (by matching message ids). If there ar
Dear Mark,
many thanks for you fast answer. But in this time, before i read your
answer, i search in the mailman documentation and i found this information.
With your answer now i know, what is going on.
I think, Goggle use the mail-message-id. Is it possible in the mailman,
to change the m
Dear friends,
with this information from the mailman admin documentation i understand
the wrong situation. I tried to discuss with the people from the admin
group on www.1net.org. But the proplem have nothing to do with
mailman-server.
many thanks for your information. But what can we/i do?
On 06/20/2014 06:03 PM, Peter Fraser wrote:
> Hi AllI have mailman-2.1.17 running on FreeBSD 9.1 along with postfix-2.11.0,1
> I noticed that bad email addresses were not being cleared out so I downloaded
> get_bounce_info.py,saved it and ran it. No bounce info was displayed.I
> checked the postf
On 06/21/2014 05:44 AM, Jérôme Fabre wrote:
>
> I use mailman on a server that hosts all my mails for some domains.
> system is release 3 ovh based on Centos6.
> with thunderbird (or any other mail client), i use port 587. But with
> this configuration, i cannot send emails to my list. I recieve a
On 6/20/14, 2:28 PM, willi uebelherr wrote:
Dear friends,
i am new on this list and come with a question to the overlay of admin
configurations over the users configurations.
In some maillist i have the problems, that the user configuration
a) Receive your own posts to the list? YES
b) Avoi
On 06/20/2014 11:28 AM, willi uebelherr wrote:
>
> In some maillist i have the problems, that the user configuration
> a) Receive your own posts to the list? YES
> b) Avoid duplicate copies of messages? NO
>
> is not working. On some maillists it is working. Never i administrate a
> mailman ins
Dear friends,
i am new on this list and come with a question to the overlay of admin
configurations over the users configurations.
In some maillist i have the problems, that the user configuration
a) Receive your own posts to the list? YES
b) Avoid duplicate copies of messages? NO
is not w
Hi AllI have mailman-2.1.17 running on FreeBSD 9.1 along with postfix-2.11.0,1
I noticed that bad email addresses were not being cleared out so I downloaded
get_bounce_info.py,saved it and ran it. No bounce info was displayed.I checked
the postfix logs and the bounce info was there. A bit from th
Hello,
I use mailman on a server that hosts all my mails for some domains.
system is release 3 ovh based on Centos6.
with thunderbird (or any other mail client), i use port 587. But with
this configuration, i cannot send emails to my list. I recieve an error
message from the daemon saying "use
30 matches
Mail list logo
