Natu writes:
> When I had the problem, in addition to signing outbound messages, I
> also increased the level of spam control. In particular I have a
> small number of users that forward their mail to gmail, and gmail
> was blocking us because of the spam that was getting forwarded. I
> sus
On 05/20/2014 05:17 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Natu writes:
>
> > If there is a dkim signature and it fails google will treat it as
> > spam
>
> Note that, taking your words literally, this is against the DKIM RFCs
> -- a failed signature is supposed to be treated the same as a lack of
> a
Natu writes:
> If there is a dkim signature and it fails google will treat it as
> spam
Note that, taking your words literally, this is against the DKIM RFCs
-- a failed signature is supposed to be treated the same as a lack of
a signature.
That doesn't mean that Google can't or doesn't use it
Natu writes:
> One difference between my method and yours is that my mail logs
> will show that somebody actually replied to that address where as
> with yours the reply would stop at the senders SMTP server. Not
> that significant, but it might be useful to know if users are using
> those a
