Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1.18-1 - this is new

2014-05-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/13/2014 10:31 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote: > Just installed a fresh copy of 2.1.18-1. Sent a test message to a list > where dmarc_moderation_action > is set to 'munge from'. The message resulted in this error log entry: > > > May 13 23:16:25 2014 (26946) Uncaught runner exception: unsupport

[Mailman-Users] 2.1.18-1 - this is new

2014-05-13 Thread Mark J Bradakis
Just installed a fresh copy of 2.1.18-1. Sent a test message to a list where dmarc_moderation_action is set to 'munge from'. The message resulted in this error log entry: May 13 23:16:25 2014 (26946) Uncaught runner exception: unsupported operand type(s) for ^=: 'int' and 'str' May 13 23:16:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Subscription flood

2014-05-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/13/2014 12:54 PM, Bill Christensen wrote: > > Sorry to be dense, but how do I apply that patch? 1)Save the patch to a file. 2)Edit the file with an editor that won't change indentation or wrap or fill lines, i.e. a text editor, not a word processor, and change problem_list in the line +

Re: [Mailman-Users] Subscription flood

2014-05-13 Thread Bill Christensen
Very wide. Vietnam, China, New York, France just at a quick look. I'm looking into fail2ban now. Thanks to those of you who have mentioned it. On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Tue, 13 May 2014 14:54:26 -0500 Bill Christensen < > billc_li...@greenbuilder.com> wrote:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Subscription flood

2014-05-13 Thread Robert Heller
At Tue, 13 May 2014 14:54:26 -0500 Bill Christensen wrote: > > I finally got a chance to look over the logs today; this is a widely > distributed attack, so address blocking is probably futile. How widely? It *could* be a /16 subnet (eg distributed over 2^^16 address) somewhere in an 'odd' p

Re: [Mailman-Users] Subscription flood

2014-05-13 Thread Bill Christensen
I finally got a chance to look over the logs today; this is a widely distributed attack, so address blocking is probably futile. Sorry to be dense, but how do I apply that patch? Thanks On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 05/09/2014 12:12 PM, Bill Christensen wrote: > > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Who authored the message?

2014-05-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/13/2014 09:48 AM, Dave Nathanson wrote: > Hi Mark, > We've got Mailman 2.1.17 at Dreamhost. ... > In this case, the message author MUA does not provide their display name, and > the list _does_ have a real name for that person, but Mailman did not insert > it. So after going through Mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Who authored the message?

2014-05-13 Thread Dave Nathanson
Hi Mark, We've got Mailman 2.1.17 at Dreamhost. List Settings: from_is_list = Mung From anonymous_list = No first_strip_reply_to = Yes reply_goes_to_list = Explicit address reply_to_address = almosteveryb...@example.com (without subdomain) Include_sender_header = Yes In this case, the message a

Re: [Mailman-Users] DMARC and Reply-To lines with from_is_list munging.

2014-05-13 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark Sapiro writes: > On 05/12/2014 01:25 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > > > How about multipart/alternative: > > > > message header > > multipart/alternative > > > > part header > > message/rfc822# original message in all its glory > > > >