On 05/08/2014 02:34 PM, Dave Nathanson wrote:
>
> AFTER DEMARC, using the best settings for us that we can:
>
> FROM: Author_Name via ListName
> TO: ListName
> REPLY-TO: ListName
>
> This is *pretty good* except that
> * I don't like the "via list name" in the from header, even though I
> u
On 05/09/2014 07:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> But the wrapped message could pass the DMARC DKIM signature check, if it
> will exactly matchs the message that came from Yahoo/AOL. (which the
> phish won't). This says that the List Headers, modified subject, list
> headers and footers should be add
Richard Damon writes:
> On 5/9/14, 10:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
> > The correct response is either for senders to stop publishing DMARC
> > policies that don't match the way their users use mail (fat chance),
> > or for recipient systems to skip the DMARC checks on mail from sources
> > that
Mark Sapiro writes:
> I finally got around to testing this.
Thanks, Mark!
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: h
Lindsay Haisley writes:
> A nice fix, albeit probably total pie-in-the-sky, would be the
> establishment of a MIME Content-Type: multipart/list-post, a variation
> on (or extension of) mulpart/mixed. MUAs SHOULD (in the RFC 2119 sense)
> effectively hide the outermost enclosing MIME envelope
On 5/9/14, 10:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> Arguably, the correct response to DMARC filtering _should_ be the MIME
>> encapsulation of list mail, with appropriate RFC 2369 headers added to
>> the enclosing MIME structure leaving the content un-munged, with all
>> information from the original poster
>Arguably, the correct response to DMARC filtering _should_ be the MIME
>encapsulation of list mail, with appropriate RFC 2369 headers added to
>the enclosing MIME structure leaving the content un-munged, with all
>information from the original poster intact. Arguably, MUAs should be
>transparent
I finally got around to testing this. I posted three times to my test
Yahoo group from 'Mark Sapiro '. One post with
the group set to send replies to the group and one post with the group
set to send replies to the sender and one post with the group set to
send replies to the sender and the group.
On 05/09/2014 12:12 PM, Bill Christensen wrote:
>
> Is there a way that I can just have it affect this one problematic
> list? If I change the name of cgi-bin/subscribe and any references to
> it (at least until the next update), do you think that will make a
> difference?
It seems to me the ea
At Fri, 09 May 2014 14:12:57 -0500 Bill Christensen
wrote:
>
> On 5/9/14 1:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> > On 05/09/2014 10:46 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
> >> I temporarily removed the signup form from the listinfo page in hopes of
> >> stemming the tide, and replaced it with a request to use th
At Fri, 09 May 2014 12:46:42 -0500 Bill Christensen
wrote:
>
> On 5/8/14 12:02 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> > On 05/08/2014 09:31 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
> >> Question 1: Is it possible to reverse the order of approval and
> >> confirmation when requiring both? The admin then can reject all th
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 04:01 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Lindsay Haisley writes:
>
> > What goes into an address comment is, or should be, purely
> > informational on a human level, and ignored on a computational
> > level.
>
> Unfortunately, we can't depend on that:
The operational te
On 5/9/14 1:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 05/09/2014 10:46 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
I temporarily removed the signup form from the listinfo page in hopes of
stemming the tide, and replaced it with a request to use the site's
contact form so that we can manually add interested subscribers. I
p
Mark Sapiro writes:
> They probably aren't using the subscribe form on the listinfo page but
> rather posting the data directly to the subscribe CGI. Try moving
> mailman's cgi-bin/subscribe aside to totally disable web subscribe.
Yeah, this seems like a different attack from the last one I he
Lindsay Haisley writes:
> What goes into an address comment is, or should be, purely
> informational on a human level, and ignored on a computational
> level.
Unfortunately, we can't depend on that:
There are a few possible mechanisms that attempt mitigation of
[display name] attacks, s
On 05/09/2014 10:46 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
>
> I temporarily removed the signup form from the listinfo page in hopes of
> stemming the tide, and replaced it with a request to use the site's
> contact form so that we can manually add interested subscribers. I
> purposely don't have a subscrib
On 5/8/14 12:02 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 05/08/2014 09:31 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
Question 1: Is it possible to reverse the order of approval and
confirmation when requiring both? The admin then can reject all those
with duplicates, only allowing the (presumably real) single subscription
r
I appreciate that the MailMan team is awesome & doing the best that can be
expected given the new DMARC restrictions being forced on us all. Thanks guys!
FEATURE REQUEST:
A setting to configure the new "From" line. Instead of
FROM: Author_Name via ListName
I want to request that MailMan let
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 15:42 -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote:
> If I felt what my users were asking for was unreasonable, I wouldn't
> have bothered to bring it here. They'd *like* to see who's posting so if
> they *choose* to reply privately they can. In the past, this was easy
> enough. The From: line was
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:11:51PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> Are you logged in as the list admin? That is, is the cookie that was created
> the last time you logged in still active?
No. I had an Alias in my Apache virtual host configuration that was
bypassing the mailman CGI script when a
Le 09/05/2014 13:36, Larry Stone a écrit :
I assume you are just a user of a list at ibiblio.org? If so, you can’t fix
it. Ibiblio.org has Mailman installed incorrectly. They need to install it
correctly. This problem affects all lists managed by this Mailman
installation so I assume you have al
On May 9, 2014, at 2:08 AM, sherwin wrote:
> I am recently having trouble posting messages to Ibiblio from my
> AT&T mail account. There have been issues lately with AOL and
> Yahoo changing their headers, but I was not affected by this.
>
> My email postings to Ibiblio are being rejected with
sherwin writes:
> : Command died with status 2:
> "/usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post midfex". Command output: Group
> mismatch
> error. Mailman expected the mail wrapper script to be executed as group
> "mailman", but the system's mail server executed the mail script as
>
I am recently having trouble posting messages to Ibiblio from my
AT&T mail account. There have been issues lately with AOL and
Yahoo changing their headers, but I was not affected by this.
My email postings to Ibiblio are being rejected with the following error:
This is the mail system at host
24 matches
Mail list logo
