Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Gary Algier writes: > On 03/27/14 04:26, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with Mailman 3. It > > seems likely to me that it "won't be hard" to get Mailman 3 and > > Sendmail to work and play well together -- but nobody has done it yet. > > > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 03/27/2014 02:40 PM, Bruce Harrison wrote: > > Anyway, proceeded with the install and got to make install, which failed with > Permission denied for the mkdir commands. > I'm running from a non-root userid who has a membership in the mailman group. > The directory /usr/local/mailman has rws

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Bruce Harrison
Thanks to all who replied. Since I've used sendmail and have limited experience with it, I decided to go with that. Less variables in the mix! :) Anyway, proceeded with the install and got to make install, which failed with Permission denied for the mkdir commands. I'm running from a non-root

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Hank van Cleef
The esteemed Mark Sapiro has said: > > On 03/26/2014 02:19 PM, Bruce Harrison wrote: > > > > We are currently running an old mailman instance and am planning to bring > > up the newest version of mailman and migrate to it. Current system uses > > sendmail. Since I now have a chance to change

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Carl Zwanzig
On 3/27/2014 2:48 AM, Adam McGreggor wrote: I don't know if it's down to popularity or not, but I notice far more questions on this list concerning Postfix than I do exim. I suspect it's due to installed base- my very unscientific survey says that there are far more sendmail and postfix sites

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Gary Algier
On 03/27/14 04:26, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Sajan Parikh writes: > sendmail is still widely used, and if I were you, I'd just stick with > what works unless you have you a particular need that sendmail wasn't > filling. +1 with caveat: Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working wit

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On 27. März 2014 09:22:02 -0400 Barry Warsaw wrote: On Mar 27, 2014, at 05:26 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with Mailman 3. It seems likely to me that it "won't be hard" to get Mailman 3 and Sendmail to work and play well together -- but nobo

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 27, 2014, at 05:26 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with Mailman 3. It >seems likely to me that it "won't be hard" to get Mailman 3 and >Sendmail to work and play well together -- but nobody has done it yet. It's certainly the intent of the pr

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Adam McGreggor
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:32:50PM -0700, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > On 3/26/2014 3:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >I'd be inclined to chose Postfix over Exim simply because Postfix is > >more popular, and new things (e.g. Mailman 3) tend to be implemented > >first for Postfix. > > FWIW, I found postfix t

Re: [Mailman-Users] building a new mailman server

2014-03-27 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Sajan Parikh writes: > sendmail is still widely used, and if I were you, I'd just stick with > what works unless you have you a particular need that sendmail wasn't > filling. +1 with caveat: Exim and Postfix both have recipes for working with Mailman 3. It seems likely to me that it "won'