Richard Damon writes:
> I will say that for a list I run, I find the alphabetical ordering
> useful.
Indeed. Ordering will be an option, and since this request is hardly
a FAQ (though I think it a pretty obviously worthwhile feature), I
suppose that the default will be the traditional alphabet
On 6/17/13 10:58 AM, Jan Lausch wrote:
> Dear Mark,
>> should multiple messages from a single address be in separate,
> time sorted boxes [...]
>
> Just my 2ct: keep it simple, no need to have many config options here:
> Just keep the "one box per sender"-idea, but sort the boxes by the time of
On 06/17/2013 10:21 AM, Matthew Needham wrote:
>
> Older.mbox contains 1512 messages, five of which contain unescaped lines
> starting with "From ". What's the best way to escape those lines and preserve
> archive order? Is it as simple as escaping the line and adding an empty "From
> " immedia
On Jun 12, 2013, at 18:09 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> On 06/12/2013 12:10 PM, Matthew Needham wrote:
>>
>> As best as I can tell, there's no way for me to determine which messages
>> were in the archive before older.mbox was added. Is there a way?
>
> If you still have the old archive (maybe o
On 06/17/2013 07:30 AM, Javad Hoseini-Nopendar wrote:
> I want the emails with implicit address to go directly to this
> mailing list. How can I do that?
In the web admin interface set Privacy options... -> Recipient filters
-> require_explicit_destination to No.
--
Mark Sapiro The hig
Hello
I sometimes need to send an email to various mailing lists at a time. The
owner of one of the mailing lists asked me to put all the addresses in BCC,
but when I put the address of my own mailing list in BCC, my email to the
group does not go directly to the group, but it requires moderato
My 2 cents for Mark Sapiro's question:
OK. Since this may be more widely used, here's a question? The current
summary groups all the messages from a single sender into one 'box'. If
we sort the boxes[1] by time, should multiple messages from a single
address be in separate, time sorted boxes or
Jan Lausch writes:
> Deal all,
>
> > I typically would prefer to see the queue of messages awaiting
> > moderation in time order, not alphabetically by email address
> > as happens by default.
>
> I totally second that notion.
Is it worth thinking about threading them?
-
Dear Mark,
> should multiple messages from a single address be in separate,
time sorted boxes [...]
Just my 2ct: keep it simple, no need to have many config options here:
Just keep the "one box per sender"-idea, but sort the boxes by the time of the
latest email from that sender.
And thus repl
On 06/17/2013 01:58 AM, Jan Lausch wrote:
>
> > I typically would prefer to see the queue of messages awaiting
>> moderation in time order, not alphabetically by email address
>> as happens by default.
>
>
> I totally second that notion.
> I have been thinking about this several times before,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:07:29AM -0400, Jason Fayre wrote:
> I've submitted the form that at&t tells you to in order to get your
> IP removed from the blacklist. I then get a response back saying
> that the IP is not blacklisted.
Usually, there's a contact address to use here.
> However, I've
Hi,
This may not be strictly on-topic for this list, but I'm getting
extremely frustrated and am hoping someone can give me some ideas.
We moved our mailman server to a VPS with a new IP address. After the
move, our IP has been blacklisted by AT&T. We had some DNS trouble
initially, and this
Deal all,
> I typically would prefer to see the queue of messages awaiting
> moderation in time order, not alphabetically by email address
> as happens by default.
I totally second that notion.
I have been thinking about this several times before, too.
Would indeed be a very useful addition.
13 matches
Mail list logo
