Re: [Mailman-Users] Privacy Options Filtering

2013-06-03 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 06/03/2013 03:21 PM, Cyndi Norwitz wrote: > This must have come at a bad time because no one seemed to have seen it. I saw it, left it in my inbox for later and never saw it again until now. Sorry and thanks for reposting. > First of all, as a wish list, I would love love love if you made so

[Mailman-Users] Privacy Options Filtering

2013-06-03 Thread Cyndi Norwitz
This must have come at a bad time because no one seemed to have seen it. I'm reposting. Thanks, Cyndi Begin forwarded message: From: Cyndi Norwitz Subject: [Mailman-Users] Privacy Options Filtering Date: April 29, 2013 1:54:26 PM PDT To: Mailman-Users@python.org Hi Mark and everyone, I'm g

Re: [Mailman-Users] Custom Pages

2013-06-03 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 06/03/2013 05:06 AM, Janice Boothe wrote: > > You are assuming that a list owner is allowing/offering more than his native > language. No, I am not. I am saying that if his list's language is one whose new template is untranslated in the new release, that page is broken for his list. > Eve

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-03 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Mark Sapiro" > On 06/03/2013 10:23 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > > > RFE: That mailman 3 permit users to specify that they subscribe with > > plus-hacked addresses (and optionally what delimiter character they > > use), > > for the purpose of poster-address val

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-03 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 06/03/2013 10:23 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > RFE: That mailman 3 permit users to specify that they subscribe with > plus-hacked addresses (and optionally what delimiter character they use), > for the purpose of poster-address validation on lists for which subscriber- > only posting is enabled.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-03 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Bill Cole" > The original poster's difficulty was that MM did not see "user@domain" > as a valid confirmer of a subscription by "user+tag@domain" but it would > be profoundly wrong for MM to do so. Making MM recognize multiple tag > delimiters would multiply

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-03 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Tanstaafl" > > The use of '+' as a tag delimiter is widespread but it is not in any > > sense a "standard" and comes nowhere near universality. There is no > > way for a Mailman instance to know which domains make "user+tag" and > > "user" equivalent and whic

Re: [Mailman-Users] Custom Pages

2013-06-03 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Janice Boothe writes: > Perhaps you are adding in additinal languages that have such little > use just to be able to say you offer a huge number of languages?  > If there was a real use for all of the others, then someone soudl; > translate. There was a real use. That's why someone *did* tra

Re: [Mailman-Users] Custom Pages

2013-06-03 Thread Janice Boothe
--- On Sun, 6/2/13, Mark Sapiro wrote: From: Mark Sapiro Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Custom Pages To: "Janice Boothe" Cc: "Mailman Users" Date: Sunday, June 2, 2013, 10:55 AM On 06/02/2013 08:23 AM, Janice Boothe wrote: > > > Maybe because I am not fully aware of il8n but I fail to see ho