Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-01 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Bill Cole" > It is altogether always wrong for ANY mail software outside of a domain > to parse the local part of an address in that domain except for a tiny > handful of standard special local parts (e.g. "postmaster"). The use of > '+' as a tag delimiter is

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM Filtering - was:(no subject)

2013-06-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/14/2013 12:43 PM, Christopher Adams wrote: > On another note, what are thoughts about utilizing SpamAssasin or other > spam software with Postfix and Mailman. It seems that a lot of the traffic > that is going through the Mailman server is spam, quite a bit which is > flagged and blocked by

Re: [Mailman-Users] External web access problems

2013-06-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/23/2013 05:58 AM, Donny Brooks wrote: > I have setup mailman on my centos 6.3 server using yum. Everything was > working with the exception of external web access due to the way our agency > has to go through the state firewall. So in order to have the ability for > people to subscribe/uns

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is Mailman 2.1 not plushack aware?

2013-06-01 Thread Bill Cole
On 30 May 2013, at 14:30, Jay Ashworth wrote: I just subscribed to the virtualgl-users list at SF, and I subscribed with a plushacked email address, jra+vgl@ Got the confirmation email ok, of course, but when I tried to send something, it bounced "because I'm not subscribed to the list". I'v